| Summary: | Naming Convention should not refer to subproject | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Community | Reporter: | Etienne Juliot <etienne.juliot> |
| Component: | Process | Assignee: | Eclipse Management Organization <emo> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | wayne.beaton |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows NT | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Etienne Juliot
You know that it's a wiki, right? :-) Search and replace for the win! FWIW, the EDP does define subproject as equivalent to project. However, I tend to agree with you anyway and prefer to use "project". I know it is a wiki, but as it is something similar to best practices or guidelines, and as it is relative to naming used in EDP, I was not confident to modify it without your review. Thanks. |