Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 48467

Summary: [Doc] Project property for "fetch absent"
Product: [Eclipse Project] Platform Reporter: Thomas Whitmore <thomasw>
Component: CVSAssignee: platform-cvs-inbox <platform-cvs-inbox>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED QA Contact:
Severity: normal    
Priority: P3 CC: hsommer, john.webber, kkumara, wlodzimierz.matzke
Version: 3.0   
Target Milestone: 3.1 RC1   
Hardware: PC   
OS: Windows 2000   
Whiteboard:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Trace Log of failed CVS Sync
none
CVS Log file
none
CVS trace of synchronize action none

Description Thomas Whitmore CLA 2003-12-11 04:10:27 EST
Hi guys,

Still seeing some unreliability at M5 with CVS Synchronize, not on branch this 
time; but just working at the head.

Perhaps 2 - 3% of files commited, won't be detected or updated by the 
Synchronize routine. Compare with/ Replace from Revision are a workaround, but 
integrity loss in the code body is of significant concern.

How can I extract or dump extra info about CVS and Workspace Resource states 
for you guys to diagnose? I haven't noticed any particular pattern to this, 
have a heapload of files which get turned over, and not sure what information 
is available which could be used for diagnosis.

Could you give specific instructions as to what analytical info is needed and 
where it can be found? Running against CVS NT if that's relevant.
Comment 1 Michael Valenta CLA 2003-12-11 09:54:59 EST
Did you do a refresh in the sync view before doing the update? The sync view 
will only update incoming changes it discovered during the latest refresh 
operation (unlike Team>Update which gets the latest).

To see the protocol trace of the communications between Eclipse and the CVS 
server, you can follow the steps at the following URL. If you did a refresh 
and still are missing incoming changes, perform the refresh again with tracing 
enabled and attach the trace to this bug.

http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/%7Echeckout%7E/platform-vcm-
home/docs/online/cvs_features2.0/cvs-faq.html#misc_0
Comment 2 Thomas Whitmore CLA 2003-12-11 22:17:12 EST
Some number of times I have experienced refreshing both in the Workspace 
resources and the CVS repository, repeat the commit on the originating machine, 
etc and still had the update not be detected.

Will look for more info & diagnostic next time, thanks for that, regards.
Comment 3 Michael Valenta CLA 2003-12-12 08:59:35 EST
I was referring to a third refresh. There is a Refresh with remote in the 
synchronize view (or is that what you meant whn you wrote "CVS repository"?).
Comment 4 Jean-Michel Lemieux CLA 2003-12-12 15:40:55 EST
We can't dupe, and we would need the trace at the time that you know that the 
sync view is not showing changes that are actually in the repo. Also with the 
trace, give us the names of the resources that you think are being missed.
Comment 5 Thomas Whitmore CLA 2003-12-13 01:23:42 EST
Thanks for your help. Though I was referring to refreshing in the CVS 
Repository Explorer, I'm aware of and use the CVS Sync Refresh button and 
believe I have used this also in one or more of these problem situations.

Somewhat separately, I feel there's a bit a solidity issue with the CVS Client 
for general Sync usage and for Branching/ Merging.

When things go wrong, I've typically copied the source folders to a backup 
location. Indeed this is now my standard practice before any Branch/ Merge 
operations are attempted.

However, when a Merge fails and I wish to manually bring in work from a backed-
up source tree, there seems no operation to Connect my folders into CVS; 
without unwanted commits on *every* file.

Basically Eclipse seems to offers absolute 'Checkout', 'Replace' 
and 'Disconnect' operations, and what seems to be a relative 'Synchronize' 
operation, but no absolute 'Connect' operation.

Such an absolute operation would determine & correct Local & Remote states of 
all files, without reference to previous local CVS tags; providing the means to 
repair damaged states & giving 'operational completeness' of workspaces against 
CVS state.

... Having experimented somewhat with the CVS preferences, and having used the 
Sync Refresh with Remote option, I don't believe these are offer an 'Absolute' 
state operation.

They may or may not be close - I couldn't get much useful improvement out of 
the 'compare content' option - but complete Operability & Repair capability on 
the cvs state would require that I could specify, for some folder tree, what 
CVS revision I was installing my source folders into. Based on this it would 
determine changes with respect to that revision and retag files.

I've had to reengineer CVS sync & reintegrate changes manually a couple of 
times now. One 'window' for problems is to Merging from a branch, and then 
continuing work in that branch. The Merge operation does not create a new 
version or whatever tag to define the merged-from point, so further work will 
not be correctly mergable.

The Absolute 'Connect' operation would have been ideal for that situation, as 
it would be ideal for any and all situations where code has been worked on 
elsewhere, or restored from backup, or sync has been damaged, and any or all 
other problem situations. So I'd really be quite keen to see such a capability.
Comment 6 Michael Valenta CLA 2003-12-15 11:04:11 EST
I agree that this would be useful although I must admit that I am having a 
hard time following your discussion above (could be due to lack of sleep on my 
part;-). Just to let you know, the Team>Share Project options does handle 
reconnecting projects but could do with some improvements. Could you open an 
enhancement request for what you asked for above. We prefer not to mix 
different bugs/enhancement requests in a single bug report.
Comment 7 Thomas Whitmore CLA 2003-12-21 19:41:39 EST
Created attachment 7259 [details]
Trace Log of failed CVS Sync
Comment 8 Thomas Whitmore CLA 2003-12-21 19:45:57 EST
Unless you've fixed this in 3m6, the problem is still there. I've just posted a 
trace log demonstrating Sync failing to detect a change. The problem persists 
despite workspace and sync refreshes.

I am not sure whether this is a failure of committal into the CVS system, or a 
failure of sync/ update to tracking state correctly. If you could indicate what 
might be going on here, I'd be interested to know.

Regards,
Thomas
Comment 9 Michael Valenta CLA 2003-12-22 08:36:47 EST
This is most likely an issue with CVS NT which is not officially supported. 
This means that we are willing to track the issue and may fix it if time 
permits (and it is a problem in out client and not in CVS NT;-). What version 
of CVS NT are you using? 
Comment 10 Thomas Whitmore CLA 2003-12-22 21:53:40 EST
This is version 2.0.11 of CVS NT. Since we're seeing an error coming back from 
CVS in the log, I'll submit the report to their guy (spoke to him once before). 
You're right, it could well be the problem there. Perhaps next day or few since 
their website is not coming up today.

On the Eclipse side it would be most useful if files with 'error' statuses were 
shown in the Sync tree; alerting us that there were problems and allowing 
manual resolution. Frankly the Progress window is not useful for errors, since 
they do not have specificity or actionable resolution from there.

Thanks again for your help.
Comment 11 Thomas Whitmore CLA 2004-01-05 20:30:03 EST
Hi Michael,

I've spoken with Tony Hoyle at cvsnt.org, email tmh@nodomain.org . His comment 
is that CVS is correctly reporting the existing revision in response to 
the 'status' command, and that the Eclipse client is then sending an 
incorrect 'new file' command.

http://www.cvsnt.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212

Quoting Tony:
> The Entry line that Eclipse is sending is "new file".  There are two errors:
> 1. You should never send a "new file" entry to the server - the standard CVS
> client explicitly checks for this and avoids doing so.
> 2. Since Eclipse has only just updated the file, it *knows* it exists, so why 
> is there a "new file" entry for that file anyway?
> 
> The resulting status report is correct, if unusual - it sees you've apparently
> added a file without going through 'cvs add' and correctly reports that this
> cannot work for this file, as it already exists.

So I'd be interested to know how this problem can be resolved. Thanks for your 
help,

Thomas
Comment 12 Michael Valenta CLA 2004-01-06 10:09:06 EST
I suspect that the problem is due to a difference in the text messages 
returned by the CVS NT server. The advanced features in the sync view depend 
on the content of text messages to properly determine the sync state of files 
(it's unfortunate but that's CVS). As I stated before, CVS NT is not 
officially supported. However, we try to maintain compatibility. 
Unfortunately, we do not have time to address this as the current time. 
Hopefully we will have time in 3.0 to investigate. 

If you want to help further, what we need to know is:

1) The exact failure case (i.e. what steps result in the failure or what sync 
state fails)

2) how the CVS NT messages differ from the *nix CVS messages in the failure 
case

If you (or anyone else who is interested) can provide either of both of these, 
that would be helpful (of course, a patch to fix the problem would be 
extremely helpful;-)
Comment 13 Michael Valenta CLA 2004-01-08 09:25:08 EST
Do you have repository prefixes enabled for you CSNT server. If they are, that 
could be a cause of the problem.
Comment 14 Thomas Whitmore CLA 2004-01-08 17:33:03 EST
No, no repository prefix is enabled or specified for CVS.

Can we identify why Eclipse is attempting to add the file as New into CVS? This 
is where the error apparently occurs. Are we agreed that Eclipse is getting an 
erroneous determination of state from results of the 'status' command?

We've got a log capturing the occurence and CVS responses, unfortunately I do 
not have a *nix box to compare different CVS implementations. Where can we take 
the troubleshooting from here?

Regards,
Thomas
Comment 15 Michael Valenta CLA 2004-01-09 09:22:06 EST
Unfortunately, it is not a simple as that. The Eclipse CVS client fakes a 
status on a new file in order to determine the actual revision of a file 
(unfortunately, CVS doesn't offer a better way). I cannot see anything 
obviously wrong with the trace you included. However, it only takes a small 
change in the message format of any command (be is status or update) to cause 
problems. If you provided the exact steps to reproduce with a simple test 
(e.g. create a project, and a file, etc.) and attach the trace from CVS NT, I 
could perform the same steps against a CVS server and compare the output. 
Another option is to use Team>Update as it uses the standard CVs uodate 
mechanism so is unaffected by text message format changes.
Comment 16 Karthik K CLA 2004-01-13 00:50:48 EST
I seem to face this problem with CVS running on a unix box and using extssh 
authentication. Quite often not all the new revisions are shown upon 
synchronize. 
Comment 17 Michael Valenta CLA 2004-01-13 09:38:04 EST
Karthik, can you please give more details. What Eclipse version are you using? 
If you perform a refresh in the sync view, do the revisions appear? If not, 
can you follow the steps in the URL mentioned in comment #1 when performing 
the refresh failure and attach the output to this bug.
Comment 18 CLA 2004-01-13 23:11:12 EST
I am also experiencing this with Eclipse 3.0 M6, Windows XP SP1.  It behaves 
correctly in 2.1.2, however.

1.  In Java perspective I select a package and right-click it for "Team-
>Synchronize with Repository..."
2.  The Team Synchronizing perspective opens and I see 7 files (new revisions) 
due for incoming.  There should actually be 8 files (new revisions) due for 
incoming as confirmed by SmartCVS and also by doing a "Compare with latest 
from HEAD" in Java view.  One file is missing in this Team Synchronizing view.
3.  "Refresh with remote" in the Team Synchronizing view does not reveal the 
missing file.  In fact no refresh in any view will show it.
4.  Doing an "Update" in the Java Perspective retrieves the file correctly, 
however.

I'm using SSH at SourceForge.
Comment 19 Karthik K CLA 2004-01-14 03:57:08 EST
I tried enabling logging, but when i synchronized none of the cvs logs showed 
up on the console. 
The eclipse version I am using is:
Version 3.0.0
Build Id:200312182000
I will try get more details when it happens again.
Comment 20 CLA 2004-01-14 08:40:33 EST
I also enabled the loggin as per the instructions but get no CVS logging 
either.
Comment 21 Michael Valenta CLA 2004-01-14 10:11:54 EST
Strange that the logging doesn't work. As long as you start eclipse using 
java.exe instead of javaw.exe and include the -debug and -consolelog then you 
can enable the logging from the Team>CVS preference page (Display detailed 
protocol output to stdout).

I still haven't been able to reproduce this. The next time it happens, please 
do the logging (if you can get it to work). Another thing to try is this:

- make sure that the comparison criteria is set to revision compare (the 
default) in the drop down menu of the title bar.
- dirty the file that should be an incoming change (i.e. modify the file in an 
editor by adding a space somewhere and save it). The file should appear in the 
sync view as an outgoing change. If it is a conflict, then that measn tht 
Eclipse knew of the incoming change but the sync view didn't show it.
- Perform a refresh with remote on the project. The file should be a conflict. 
If not, perform a refresh with remote, directly on the file. If it is still 
not a conflict, perform a commit on the file. The commit should fail (if it 
doesn't then that means that there was no incoming change on the file in the 
first place).
Comment 22 CLA 2004-01-14 11:27:57 EST
I hadn't set Team>CVS preference page (Display detailed protocol output to 
stdout).  This wasn't in the instructions.

Comment 23 Michael Valenta CLA 2004-01-14 12:02:24 EST
What I mentioned was an alternative method of enabling logging. Both should 
work.
Comment 24 CLA 2004-01-14 12:27:03 EST
Logging is working now, but I've lost my test case since I had to do a 
forced "Update".  All I can say is a general statement, that the Team CVS 
Synch view is sometimes missing some files that should be included as 
incoming.  Trust me, the bug is there!
Comment 25 Michael Valenta CLA 2004-01-14 12:49:49 EST
I believe you but there is nothing I can do until I can reproduce it or am 
given more details about the failure case. All the reports in this bug are 
rather vague (i.e. they report a problem but do not offer a specific 
description of the situation or the steps to reproduce). Since it is not 
happening for everyone, I am assuming that there is something unique to your 
setup that is triggering the bug. By the way, what is you setup (e.g. Eclipse 
version , CVS server version, connection method, JVM)? Since it seems to be 
happening frequently for those who have posted to this bug, my hope is that we 
can obtain enough information to determine where the failure is occurring. all 
help in this matter is greatly appreciated.
Comment 26 CLA 2004-01-14 13:00:41 EST
I did post some specs, but here they are again:

Eclipse 3.0 M6
Windows XP SP1
JDK 1.4.2_02
public CVS at SourceForge (don't know the version)
extssh connection

I'll just have to keep an eye open for it.
Comment 27 CLA 2004-01-14 20:20:50 EST
Just a reminder - when I experienced the problem with the missing resoure in 
3.0 M6, it showed OK using Eclipse 2.1.2.
Comment 28 Thomas Whitmore CLA 2004-01-16 23:44:41 EST
Michael,

Let's have some solidity in the CVS Synchronize operation and UI. If it's so 
dependent on implementation-specific string matching then let's see an 
*unrecognized* or error node in the tree for files where no exact match, either 
positive or negative, is recognized.

Attaching the specific CVS sync log for that file to the error node, would also 
enable prompt diagnosis.

Also helpful in making sync more reliable, would be a more relaxed/ tolerant 
matching of strings or statuses, and/ or a Preferences UI page where the 
relevant strings could be specified.

Basically if you implement the 'unrecognized' sync node and CVS interaction 
details we'll have the problem probably solved in 5 minutes next time it 
occurs; and diagnosis in this area will never be troublesome again. Good idea?


Regards,
Thomas
Comment 29 CLA 2004-01-17 08:22:29 EST
I think it is an excellent idea.

Is this bug related at all to Bug 45138?  

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=45138
Comment 30 Michael Valenta CLA 2004-01-19 09:39:29 EST
Someone at our office has seen a similar problem to this. There are two 
characteristics of his workflow that may be related. He works offline a lot 
(i.e. at home, he cannot connect to his repository) and uses an external tool 
(which measnhe uses refresh with local to get his changes into Eclipse). Does 
anyone else experiencing this problem have these charateristics in their 
workflow.

As per comment #28, we are working on improving the flexibility of our message 
parsing. We will take you comments into consideration.
Comment 31 CLA 2004-01-19 11:12:05 EST
Michael,

well I do work from home and work offline sometimes but I do access the 
SourceForge repository as well directly in Eclipse 3M6.  I don't use external 
tool.

PB
Comment 32 Karthik K CLA 2004-01-19 23:11:45 EST
In my case we have some generated files which we have to refresh after running 
the generator (which is run as a seperate application). But the problems seem 
to occur with regular (non generated)files also.
Comment 33 Karthik K CLA 2004-01-20 00:00:18 EST
Created attachment 7484 [details]
CVS Log file

CVS Log file, The file SimpleConstraint was modified and commited to cvs, but
when I synchronize, I dont see the file in the Synchronize View.
Comment 34 CLA 2004-01-20 07:53:02 EST
Created attachment 7486 [details]
CVS trace of synchronize action

A colleague added a new file (export.gif) and edited 4 other files
(folder_closed.gif, folder_new.gif, folder_open.gif, import.gif) and committed
them to SourceForge.  I did a "Synchronize with repository" and the Team View
tree only shows one file, "export.gif"
Comment 35 Michael Valenta CLA 2004-01-20 09:06:00 EST
I now see the problem. We have code that determines whether our remote bytes 
are stale. It assumes that all incoming revisions will be later on the same 
line of descent. That is, that revision 1.2 will follow 1.1. However, it 
appears that the initial revision on HEAD can also be 1.1.1.1. I now recall 
that this occurs after an import. We don't see this when projects are first 
committed from Eclipse because import is not used. we will need to adjust the 
logic for determining when remote sync bytes are stale.
Comment 36 CLA 2004-01-20 09:32:37 EST
That's good Michael,

I also had another synch error (didn't get the log) where I had a copy of a 
foobar.java file CVS version 1.6.  Colleague committed to new version 1.7.  My 
Resource History for foobar.java clearly shows 1.7 in the History List with 
1.6 in the list with an asterisk next to it (my local copy).  I then do 
a "Synchoronise with repository" and it does not add 1.7 to the tree but adds 
version 1.6 - needs to be updated (incoming) which I already have.
Comment 37 Michael Valenta CLA 2004-01-20 09:57:46 EST
Philip, the revision shown in the sync view is actualy the local revision. If 
you open a compare editor on the file, the left pane title should show the 
incoming revision.
Comment 38 CLA 2004-01-20 10:08:29 EST
OK Michael,

but even though I didn't save the log for that one, I did look at it and it 
had one of those "RESULT> Status WARNINGorg.eclipse.team.cvs.core code=1" type 
messages.
Comment 39 Michael Valenta CLA 2004-01-20 10:18:56 EST
I suspect that the warning was just indicating that there were E messages from 
the server. If thefre were any serious problems they would also appear in the 
Error Log. Is there anything in the error log?
Comment 40 CLA 2004-01-20 10:35:22 EST
Nothing in the error log.  I'll keep my eye on it.
Comment 41 Michael Valenta CLA 2004-01-20 12:12:31 EST
Assigning for verification. Changes were made to 
ResourceSyncInfo.isLaterRevision and a test case was added 
(CVSWorkspaceSubscriberTest.testSyncAfterImport).
Comment 42 Michael Valenta CLA 2004-01-20 12:13:33 EST
Fix released to HEAD
Comment 43 Michael Valenta CLA 2004-01-22 09:33:09 EST
*** Bug 50382 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 44 Michael Valenta CLA 2004-01-22 09:33:33 EST
*** Bug 50387 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 45 Jean-Michel Lemieux CLA 2004-02-11 13:25:57 EST
Verified, but also raised a separate bug aboug adding tracing to refresh 
operations to simplify debugging:
1. we could show a dump of remote revision tree found on refresh
2. we could show a dump of reconcilling done by the subscriber
See Bug 51708 
Comment 46 John L. Webber CLA 2004-11-11 08:47:28 EST
I'm seeing similar behaviour with Eclipse 3.0.1 (200409161125) on SuSE Linux Pro
8.2 (Gnome). The scenario: a colleague checked in a new directory and several
new files in an existing project (using command-line CVS), as well as changes to
existing files. I used Team -> Synchronize from the Package Explorer (about 14
hours later), which picked up the changes to existing files but not the new
directory with its new files. A command-line cvs update executed some time later
showed the new files.
Our CVS repository runs on a Solaris box.
I'm afraid I can't submit any more documentary evidence at the moment: the bug
happens sporadically, rarely more than once a week. The next time it happens
I'll try and gather more information. Perhaps this bug should be reopened?
Comment 47 John L. Webber CLA 2004-12-13 02:57:57 EST
This bug definitely still exists in Version: 3.0.1
Build id: 200409161125. Scenario: I came into the office Monday morning. Booted
my machine. Started Eclipse. Saw in my mails that a colleague had checked in 3
new files in a new subdirectory of an existing directory in a project. Ran Team
-> Synch on the project - the files were not found. Went to a shell, cd'd to the
existing directory, executed "cvs up -dP", and the new subdirectory and files
were checked out. After a refresh in Eclipse, the files showed up there too.

It's getting so that I'm afraid to use Eclipse for any critical CVS operation,
like merging or branching. What additional documentation can help you pin down
this bug?
Comment 48 Jean-Michel Lemieux CLA 2004-12-13 10:25:03 EST
The next time you synchronize and new files don't appear, do the following:
1. on the CVS preference page (the main one) enable the preference called
"display detailed protocol output..." and restart eclipse so that you have a
console visible (e.g. somewhere to dump stdout).
2. run the synchronize
3. open a new bug with the synchronize protocol output and the names/paths of
the files that were not found.
4. run an update from without eclipse, append output to same bug.

Thanks.
Comment 49 Luis Bernardo CLA 2005-01-13 17:48:20 EST
I also believe this is not fixed (I think my problem is related to this one). I
am using Eclipse 3.0.1 (200409161125). I added a branch using eclipse to my
sourceforge project. I can see the branch using the eclise used to create the
branch (I never did a team->disconnect ...) and I can see it using sourceforge
viewcvs webinterface. I cannot see the branch using a different eclipse in a
different machine (tested both in linux and windows using the same eclipse
build). You can check this here (the branch I want to see is php5):
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/myhelpdesk/myhelpdesk/?only_with_tag=php5.
You can use eclipse with :pserver:anonymous@cvs.sf.net:/cvsroot/myhelpdesk to test. 
Comment 50 Michael Valenta CLA 2005-01-13 18:47:02 EST
Re: Comment 49: This problem would appear to be unrelated to the original 
problem reported by this bug. Eclipse does not automatically discover new 
branches but they can easily be discovered by either refreshing or configuring 
the tags for a project. This is descibed in the documentation.
Comment 51 John L. Webber CLA 2005-01-20 06:03:31 EST
I'm reopening this per Jean-Michel's request below. To me it looks like Eclipse
should call "cvs update -Pd"; maybe there's some way of configuring this I'm
missing?

The missing files are:

webapps
webapps/sandbox
webapps/sandbox/newsitemap.xmap
webapps/sandbox/sitemap.xmap
webapps/sandbox/no-session
webapps/sandbox/no-session/customerservicenosite-body.xml
webapps/sandbox/no-session/footer.xml
webapps/sandbox/no-session/header-no-session.xml
webapps/sandbox/no-session/html-head.xml
webapps/sandbox/no-session/index-body.xml
webapps/sandbox/no-session/indexregister-body.xml
webapps/sandbox/no-session/login.xml
webapps/sandbox/no-session/menu.xml
webapps/sandbox/no-session/menu.xsl
webapps/sandbox/no-session/nosll.xsl
webapps/sandbox/no-session/page.xml
webapps/sandbox/no-session/page.xsl
webapps/sandbox/no-session/passwordforgot-body.xml
webapps/sandbox/no-session/ssl.xsl


Here's the log from Eclipse's CVS update (synchronize doesn't produce a log):

***
cvs update -P "/jentromanager"
    cvs server: Updating .
    cvs server: Updating accounting
    cvs server: Updating accounting/src
    cvs server: Updating accounting/src/java

-- snip, nothing of interest here --

    cvs server: Updating voucher/src/test/com/jentro/manager/voucher/persistent/impl
    cvs server: Updating xdocs
ok (took 0:34.091)
***

And the log from the CVS command in a shell:

jlw@john2:~/development/jentro/HEAD/jentromanager> cvs up -dP
cvs server: Updating .
cvs server: Updating accounting
cvs server: Updating accounting/src
cvs server: Updating accounting/src/java

-- snip, nothing of interest here --

cvs server: Updating voucher/src/test/com/jentro/manager/voucher/persistent/impl
cvs server: Updating webapps
cvs server: Updating webapps/sandbox
U webapps/sandbox/newsitemap.xmap
U webapps/sandbox/sitemap.xmap
cvs server: Updating webapps/sandbox/no-session
U webapps/sandbox/no-session/customerservicenosite-body.xml
U webapps/sandbox/no-session/footer.xml
U webapps/sandbox/no-session/header-no-session.xml
U webapps/sandbox/no-session/html-head.xml
U webapps/sandbox/no-session/index-body.xml
U webapps/sandbox/no-session/indexregister-body.xml
U webapps/sandbox/no-session/login.xml
U webapps/sandbox/no-session/menu.xml
U webapps/sandbox/no-session/menu.xsl
U webapps/sandbox/no-session/nosll.xsl
U webapps/sandbox/no-session/page.xml
U webapps/sandbox/no-session/page.xsl
U webapps/sandbox/no-session/passwordforgot-body.xml
U webapps/sandbox/no-session/ssl.xsl
cvs server: Updating xdocs
Comment 52 Michael Valenta CLA 2005-01-20 12:49:55 EST
There is a CVS project property for enabling/disabling the -d option (fetch 
absent directories). Is it off for your project?
Comment 53 John L. Webber CLA 2005-01-21 02:48:20 EST
Is this under Prefererences -> Team -> CVS? I don't see a "fetch absent
directories". I see "Prune empty directories" (checked), but can't find the
setting you mention. I'm currently using Eclipse on SuSE 9.0 (KDE 3.1),
Eclipse Version: 3.0.1
Build id: 200409161125
Comment 54 Michael Valenta CLA 2005-01-21 09:14:02 EST
No it's available from the Properties dialog of the project in the Navigator, 
Packages Explorer, etc. Choose Properties from the context menu of the 
project, click and CVs and you should see the option in question.
Comment 55 John L. Webber CLA 2005-01-25 03:31:39 EST
Oh yes, now I found it, and it wasn't checked for that project. Sorry! Maybe
this should be a FAQ somewhere?
Comment 56 Michael Valenta CLA 2005-05-25 11:28:11 EDT
I have updated the doc