| Summary: | [CSS] Regression: displayStereotypes:false stopped working for Dependencies | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Modeling] Papyrus | Reporter: | Toni Siljamäki <toni.siljamaki> | ||||
| Component: | Diagram | Assignee: | Project Inbox <mdt-papyrus-inbox> | ||||
| Status: | VERIFIED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | major | ||||||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | Celine.janssens, nifauvergue, papyrus-bugs | ||||
| Version: | 1.1.0 | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | 1.1.0 | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | All | ||||||
| See Also: |
https://git.eclipse.org/r/48980 https://git.eclipse.org/c/papyrus/org.eclipse.papyrus.git/commit/?id=e36c7e8cfb7751c53fae3f18ee4ed79b92f3b5e3 |
||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Bug Depends on: | 460428 | ||||||
| Bug Blocks: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
I guess the rules have changed with the new Stereotypes implementation. Not sure what is the new (preferred) syntax now. It is now possible to specify exactly "which" stereotypes should be displayed and which ones shouldn't, or to display/hide everything (Better granularity) Still, the former syntax should still be supported, for legacy purpose. Celine and Nicolas, can you please have a look at this? New Gerrit change created: https://git.eclipse.org/r/48980 Also note that the displayStereotypes property is not yet documented. See Bug 460428 and the detailed mail on "Improved CSS documentation". Gerrit change https://git.eclipse.org/r/48980 was merged to [master]. Commit: http://git.eclipse.org/c/papyrus/org.eclipse.papyrus.git/commit/?id=e36c7e8cfb7751c53fae3f18ee4ed79b92f3b5e3 Testing Papyrus UML 1.1.0.201506151114 displayStereotypes:false works for dependencies again. Closing this one. |
Created attachment 253334 [details] Screenshot - Messy Diagram Testing Papyrus UML 1.1.0.201505070924 Suddenly the displayStereotypes:false stopped working for dependencies, resulting in very messy diagrams. When looking in the Properties.Appearance for the dependencies the stereotypes should not be displayed, but they are. (see attachment) I have not tested this for any other types of stereotyped links.