Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
| Summary: | If necessary, mark e4 committers as alumni | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Eclipse Project] e4 | Reporter: | Jonas Helming <jhelming> |
| Component: | Tools | Assignee: | Project Inbox <e4.tools-inbox> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | Lars.Vogel, wayne.beaton |
| Version: | 0.17 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows NT | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Jonas Helming
Nobody has been nominated, so I think we can do this now. @Wayne: As far as I understood, you have a way to do it semi-automatically? (In reply to Jonas Helming from comment #1) > Nobody has been nominated, so I think we can do this now. @Wayne: As far as > I understood, you have a way to do it semi-automatically? I'm not quite sure what "it" is. I can retire committers, but you'll have to tell me who needs to be retired from e4. Be specific. Sorry. It is about the e4 tools, which have been moved to the platform project now. For this restructuring, you mentioned before that we need to mark all committers who have commits in that repo (potentially all e4 committers), but are not committer on the new project (platform) have to be listed as historic committers. You mentioned before in https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=458555 that you might do that with a script, but if you need help, please let me know. I've surmised that this is the repository that was moved: /gitroot/platform/eclipse.platform.ui.tools.git AFAICT, the following e4 committers have commits in the new repository along with their active and inactive dates (note that I use Capt. Kirk's birthdate as the 'null' inactive date, it saves having to check for NULL in queries). These are, I believe, the "Historical" committers. +---------+----------+------------+--------------+ | first | last | activeDate | inactiveDate | +---------+----------+------------+--------------+ | Angelo | ZERR | 2009-02-03 | 2012-08-28 | | Andrew | Niefer | 2009-07-06 | 2012-08-28 | | Boris | Bokowski | 2008-10-30 | 2012-08-28 | | Brian | de Alwis | 2010-04-06 | 2233-03-22 | | Markus | Kuppe | 2013-11-19 | 2233-03-22 | | Daniel | Rolka | 2013-09-04 | 2015-02-02 | | Dean | Roberts | 2011-05-18 | 2233-03-22 | | Eric | Moffatt | 2008-10-30 | 2233-03-22 | | Bogdan | Gheorghe | 2008-10-30 | 2233-03-22 | | John | Arthorne | 2008-10-30 | 2233-03-22 | | Jonas | Helming | 2013-01-04 | 2233-03-22 | | Lars | Vogel | 2009-12-16 | 2233-03-22 | | Marco | Descher | 2014-01-27 | 2233-03-22 | | Olivier | Prouvost | 2013-12-16 | 2233-03-22 | | Paul | Webster | 2008-10-30 | 2233-03-22 | | Remy | Suen | 2009-01-02 | 2233-03-22 | | Simon | Scholz | 2015-01-21 | 2233-03-22 | | Steven | Spungin | 2014-06-09 | 2233-03-22 | | Thomas | Schindl | 2008-10-30 | 2233-03-22 | | Wim | Jongman | 2012-11-20 | 2233-03-22 | +---------+----------+------------+--------------+ Does this look about right? I narrowed it down a bit by excluding those committers who have been committers on eclipse.platform.ui since before becoming committers on eclipse.e4 (we won't need "historical" records for them). +---------+----------+------------+--------------+ | first | last | activeDate | inactiveDate | +---------+----------+------------+--------------+ | Angelo | ZERR | 2009-02-03 | 2012-08-28 | | Andrew | Niefer | 2009-07-06 | 2012-08-28 | | Boris | Bokowski | 2008-10-30 | 2012-08-28 | | Brian | de Alwis | 2010-04-06 | 2233-03-22 | | Markus | Kuppe | 2013-11-19 | 2233-03-22 | | Daniel | Rolka | 2013-09-04 | 2015-02-02 | | Dean | Roberts | 2011-05-18 | 2233-03-22 | | Bogdan | Gheorghe | 2008-10-30 | 2233-03-22 | | Jonas | Helming | 2013-01-04 | 2233-03-22 | | Lars | Vogel | 2009-12-16 | 2233-03-22 | | Marco | Descher | 2014-01-27 | 2233-03-22 | | Olivier | Prouvost | 2013-12-16 | 2233-03-22 | | Remy | Suen | 2009-01-02 | 2233-03-22 | | Simon | Scholz | 2015-01-21 | 2233-03-22 | | Steven | Spungin | 2014-06-09 | 2233-03-22 | | Wim | Jongman | 2012-11-20 | 2233-03-22 | +---------+----------+------------+--------------+ Note that any of these committers who are current committers on platform.ui will show up in both the "committers" section and the "historical committers" section. This is technically correct, but maybe a bit weird, according to our definition of "historical committer". Looks good to me... (In reply to Jonas Helming from comment #6) > Looks good to me... +1 AFAICS no action has been done here for a while hence I close this bug. Jonas/Wayne, please reopen if you still plan to do something here. |