Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
| Summary: | [proposal] technology.sfcurve | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Community | Reporter: | Melissa Taylor <melissa> |
| Component: | Proposals and Reviews | Assignee: | Eclipse Management Organization <emo> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | andrea.ross, caniszczyk, cne1x, denis.roy, gunnar, jnhuva, rdemanuele, stephanie.swart, wayne.beaton, webmaster |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows 7 | ||
| URL: | https://www.locationtech.org/proposals/sfcurve | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Bug Depends on: | 460357, 460360 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Melissa Taylor
Trademark has been approved. I've scheduled a creation review for SFCurve to conclude on April 1st. Please continue to monitor communication channels. Following the creation review, we will initiate the provisioning process. As part of this process, we will bring committers on board. To gain committer status, some paperwork must be completed. The exact nature of that paperwork depends on several factors, including the employment status on the individual and the Eclipse Foundation membership status of the employer. There's information here: http://eclip.se/3I If you can be ready with the paperwork in time for the completion of the creation review, then we can move quickly through the provisioning process. When we initiate provisioning, committers will be sent an email with instructions; please don't send any paperwork in until after you receive those instructions. Hi Wayne, From CCRI, Chris Eichelberger (cne1x@ccri.com) and I (jnh5y@ccri.com) will be initial committers. We've already done paperwork for GeoMesa. Is there anything else we'll need to do? If so, I'm happy to get that sorted over the next week. Thanks, Jim (In reply to Jim Hughes from comment #3) > From CCRI, Chris Eichelberger (cne1x@ccri.com) and I (jnh5y@ccri.com) will > be initial committers. We've already done paperwork for GeoMesa. I see that. This will teach me to blindly use boilerplate text :-) > Is there anything else we'll need to do? If so, I'm happy to get that > sorted over the next week. I think that you're in good shape. I declare this review successful! Allow me to once again blindly use boilerplate text... We will initiate the project resources provisioning process shortly. Please tell your project committers to carefully monitor their email for a message from The Eclipse Foundation with instructions for providing committer paperwork. More information: http://eclip.se/3J Our IT team cannot allocate project resources until after we have processed the paperwork for at least one committer, so your attention in this matter will keep the process moving forward. Be advised that the paperwork process will time out after 120 days; any committers who are unable to complete their paperwork requirements in this timeframe will have to be elected to the project (your project mentors can provide assistance with this). Immediately following the provisioning process, your next step will be to submit an initial contribution for review by the IP Team. Please do not commit any code to an Eclipse Foundation Git repository until after you receive the IP Team's approval. In anticipation of this step, you may consider ensuring that your code has the required copyright headers and namespace (if applicable). More information: http://eclip.se/3K If you have any questions, please send a message to emo@eclipse.org and we will provide assistance. An overview of the complete project creation process is here: http://eclip.se/3L Thanks Wayne. Since at least Chris and I are totally groovy on committer paperwork, what happens next? Shout if we need to do anything. Thanks in advance, Jim All committers have paperwork already with Eclipse. Once the "processing paperwork" step is passed, I'll work on submitting an initial contribution. (In reply to Rob Emanuele from comment #7) > All committers have paperwork already with Eclipse. Once the "processing > paperwork" step is passed, I'll work on submitting an initial contribution. Sounds like a good plan. (In reply to Jim Hughes from comment #6) > Since at least Chris and I are totally groovy on committer > paperwork, what happens next? You still need to do the web form. After that, I believe you're just waiting for webmaster to push all the buttons that need pushing. Wayne, I've logged into the portal, but do not see a link available for filling out the Member Committer Questionnaire for SFCurve. Is there a specific place Ishould be looking? Thanks! Wayne, Sorry to be dense: Is this the form in question: https://www.eclipse.org/projects/project_provisioning_request.php As a note, I don't see something like 'locationtech.technology.sfcurve'. Thanks, Jim (In reply to Jim Hughes from comment #10) > Sorry to be dense: Is this the form in question: > https://www.eclipse.org/projects/project_provisioning_request.php Nope. Not that. It seems that we've hit a corner of the process that I haven't looked at in a while. I think that since you're already committers, there's nothing for you to do. I'll confirm with the IP team. I think that they've gone home, so we may not see any movement until Monday. Hi all, I just wanted to check in after the holiday weekend and see if there was anything I needed to do to move things along. Thanks in advance, Jim When the provisioning is approved, they need an empty git repo provisioned at the LocationTech organization. Hi all, Sharon approved checkin here: https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9590. Is there anything else we need to do to get the repo created? Thanks, Jim The ball is in our court now. I've created the empty repo here: https://github.com/locationtech/sfcurve and updated the LocationTech PMI so SFCurve committers should be receiving their team invitations shortly. -M. |