Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 457483

Summary:	Move JGit and EGit to offset+1 on release train
Product:	Community	Reporter:	Gorkem Ercan <gorkem.ercan>
Component:	Cross-Project	Assignee:	Cross-Project issues <cross-project.inbox>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED	QA Contact:
Severity:	normal
Priority:	P3	CC:	alkazako, matthias.sohn, shr31223, vrubezhny, wayne.beaton
Version:	unspecified
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	PC
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
Bug Depends on:
Bug Blocks:	458521, 459732

Description Gorkem Ercan

2015-01-14 12:44:30 EST

JSDT project, which has a offset+2 on the release train is planning on a new functionality that requires JGit. Right now JGit is offset+3 and to make this dependency easier, I would like to request JGit to move to offset+1 or offset+2 on the release train.

Comment 1 Matthias Sohn

2015-01-14 16:37:37 EST

As I said on the cross projects list [1] we can move to +1, I guess you want that for Mars, right ?

[1] https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg11434.html

Comment 2 Gorkem Ercan

2015-01-14 19:08:29 EST

(In reply to Matthias Sohn from comment #1)
> As I said on the cross projects list [1] we can move to +1, I guess you want
> that for Mars, right ?
> 
Correct. Mars is the target.

Comment 3 Matthias Sohn

2015-01-15 02:42:13 EST

Wayne could you please set the offset for JGit and EGit to +1 ? Not sure where this is tracked.

Comment 4 Victor Rubezhny

2015-01-27 08:04:39 EST

Hi!

Is there any progress on this issue?

Comment 5 Matthias Sohn

2015-01-27 08:53:27 EST

I will contribute the next version to Mars at offset +1 not regarding if the meta data maintained somewhere at the foundation has been updated or not ;-)

Comment 6 Wayne Beaton

2015-01-27 10:34:02 EST

(In reply to Matthias Sohn from comment #3)
> Wayne could you please set the offset for JGit and EGit to +1 ? Not sure
> where this is tracked.

I track it in the PMI:

https://projects.eclipse.org/releases/mars

But this is just a reflection of the relationship between projects, it doesn't drive any of the processes.

Comment 7 Matthias Sohn

2015-01-27 11:51:26 EST

I think we can then close this bug