Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 414149

Summary: Rename "Eclipse Industry Working Group" to "Eclipse Working Group"
Product: Community Reporter: Ralph Mueller <ralph>
Component: WebsiteAssignee: phoenix.ui <phoenix.ui-inbox>
Status: RESOLVED FIXED QA Contact:
Severity: normal    
Priority: P3 CC: chris.guindon, contact, ian.skerrett
Version: unspecified   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: PC   
OS: Mac OS X   
Whiteboard: stalebug

Description Ralph Mueller CLA 2013-07-31 11:04:05 EDT
Just recently we have changed the naming for Working Groups.

Accordingly, this should be reflected on the Eclipse web properties.

I have found the following documents that need changing:

http://eclipse.org/org/industry-workgroups/industry_wg_process.php
http://eclipse.org/org/industry-workgroups/IWG_Participation_Agreement.pdf
http://www.eclipse.org/org/industry-workgroups/autowg.php
http://www.eclipse.org/org/industry-workgroups/m2miwg_charter.php

Can the following WG's be archived?
http://www.eclipse.org/org/industry-workgroups/mobilewg.php
Comment 1 Ian Skerrett CLA 2013-07-31 11:25:30 EDT
(In reply to comment #0)
> Just recently we have changed the naming for Working Groups.
> 
> Accordingly, this should be reflected on the Eclipse web properties.
> 
> I have found the following documents that need changing:
> 
> http://eclipse.org/org/industry-workgroups/industry_wg_process.php
> http://eclipse.org/org/industry-workgroups/IWG_Participation_Agreement.pdf
> http://www.eclipse.org/org/industry-workgroups/autowg.php
> http://www.eclipse.org/org/industry-workgroups/m2miwg_charter.php
> 
> Can the following WG's be archived?
> http://www.eclipse.org/org/industry-workgroups/mobilewg.php

As luck would have it I was working on this today. :-)

The process document has been updated. I will do the participation agreement once I get the source document.

I would suggest the Auto and M2M working groups take on changing their charters or at least delegate it to me.

For the Mobile and SOA, I have added a 'TERMINATED' title to each charter. We also need to add the 'Out of date' flag to http://eclipse.org/pulsar/.  We also need to do the same for SOA.  Chris G can you help here?
Comment 2 Denis Roy CLA 2013-07-31 11:53:33 EDT
*** Bug 414150 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Eclipse Genie CLA 2015-07-22 17:13:26 EDT
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.
Comment 4 Eclipse Genie CLA 2017-07-12 03:14:34 EDT
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.
Comment 5 Christopher Guindon CLA 2019-02-19 21:55:10 EST
(In reply to Ian Skerrett from comment #1)

> For the Mobile and SOA, I have added a 'TERMINATED' title to each charter.
> We also need to add the 'Out of date' flag to http://eclipse.org/pulsar/. 
> We also need to do the same for SOA.  Chris G can you help here?

Done! Closing this bug!