Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 407375

Summary: org.eclipse.pde.junit.runtime.addon.feature.group missing in Kepler M7 repo
Product: [Eclipse Project] Platform Reporter: Gunnar Wagenknecht <gunnar>
Component: RelengAssignee: Platform-Releng-Inbox <platform-releng-inbox>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact:
Severity: normal    
Priority: P3 CC: david_williams
Version: 4.3   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:

Description Gunnar Wagenknecht CLA 2013-05-07 05:42:48 EDT
http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/updates/4.3milestones/S-4.3M7-201305020800/ 

The p2 IU 'org.eclipse.pde.junit.runtime.addon.feature.group' is missing the the Kepler M7 Eclipse repo. It was there for previous milestones.
Comment 1 David Williams CLA 2013-05-07 09:58:10 EDT
Thanks for the report of "differences" ... now the important question ... do you need it? If so, what for? 

It was removed intentionally, see bug 404213.
Comment 2 Gunnar Wagenknecht CLA 2013-05-07 10:04:05 EDT
Hi David,

we need them in our target platform in order to be able to execute headless JUnit Plugin Tests when developing Equinox based solutions.

Thus, removing them completely would break the possibility of executing headless plug-in tests.

-Gunnar
Comment 3 David Williams CLA 2013-05-07 10:19:40 EDT
(In reply to comment #2)
> Hi David,
> 
> we need them in our target platform in order to be able to execute headless
> JUnit Plugin Tests when developing Equinox based solutions.
> 
> Thus, removing them completely would break the possibility of executing
> headless plug-in tests.
> 
> -Gunnar

So you need both of them? I suggest you re-open bug 404213 (mark this as a dup of it) and make your case there. 

My main question is if we are providing a "convenient feature slice", "just for you" (that you could create yourself) ... or, if this is a fundamental service to equinox community? (And, I don't mean that to be confrontational ... just thinking it through, trying to reduce things in our build, that we do not use).
Comment 4 Gunnar Wagenknecht CLA 2013-05-07 11:24:39 EDT
(In reply to comment #3)
> My main question is if we are providing a "convenient feature slice", "just
> for you" (that you could create yourself) ... or, if this is a fundamental
> service to equinox community? (And, I don't mean that to be confrontational
> ... just thinking it through, trying to reduce things in our build, that we
> do not use).

I understand your goal. But I think it's very late in the game to remove things that have been there for years.
Comment 5 Gunnar Wagenknecht CLA 2013-05-07 11:25:03 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 404213 ***