| Summary: | [Commands] ExecutionException leads to InjectionException | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Eclipse Project] Platform | Reporter: | Christian Oelsner <C.Oelsner> |
| Component: | UI | Assignee: | Platform UI Triaged <platform-ui-triaged> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Paul Elder <pelder.eclipse> |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | Lars.Vogel, pwebster |
| Version: | 4.2.1 | Keywords: | helpwanted |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | candidate43 | ||
|
Description
Christian Oelsner
Some details to my configuration: eclipse.buildId=M20120914-1800 java.version=1.7.0_09-icedtea java.vendor=Oracle Corporation BootLoader constants: OS=linux, ARCH=x86_64, WS=gtk, NL=de_DE Framework arguments: -product org.eclipse.sdk.ide Plugin overview says: org.eclipse.e4.ui.di - 0.10.1.v20120523-1955 Hi Christian, This behavior in forever in Eclipse 3.x. The Eclipse development for Eclipse 3.x has stopped as the effort has switched Eclipse 4.x. So I have to close that as won't fix and suggest you have a look at Eclipse4. Should look at the workbench code. PW Hi, @Lars: Don't get me wrong on this, I don't want to change code within Eclipse 3.x. Actually it worked absolutly charming with Eclipse 3.x (and 4.x !). I think all this came with the e4 dependencies of the EMF Plug-ins. This is at least what I've read in the web ?! And to be honest: Even if this is some "legacy" code, you can't change the way it is processed for many versions, only because you think the latest developments are the best. For me this is the best example for some regressions .... but that's only my opinion and maybe I'm getting the hole thing wrong ... Oh and the last thing: what I've meant with all the "the method provides exception so it should be handled right" was something like "design by contract". I fulfilled the contract so I want to get my code handled right, not to be thrown only to log ... This has nothing to do with Eclipse version, but with doing what it supposed to be. Cheers Christian It's just behaviour that hasn't been ported to the 4.2 Workbench. PW Marking as WONTFIX, we have currently no plans to change the current behavior. Please reopen if you want to contribute a fix for that. |