Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 395660

Summary:	Simplify memSize() and treeSize() implementation in ASTNode
Product:	[Eclipse Project] JDT	Reporter:	Jay Arthanareeswaran <jarthana>
Component:	Core	Assignee:	JDT-Core-Inbox <jdt-core-inbox>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:
Severity:	minor
Priority:	P3	CC:	markus.kell.r, srikanth_sankaran
Version:	3.8
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:	stalebug

Description Jay Arthanareeswaran

2012-12-04 00:41:39 EST

From the bug 391890, comment #7:

"The memSize/treeSize implementations are hard to read. As a long-term solution, I would deprecate ASTNode#subtreeBytes(), since it's not really useful for anybody. For now, I think the least error-prone solution is to implement both memSize() and treeSize() in nodes that affect their return value, and then use super.*Size() + <size of fields> rather than referring to superclass fields."

Comment 1 Eclipse Genie

2020-01-21 10:37:28 EST

This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet. As such, we're closing this bug.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it and reopen this bug. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.

--
The automated Eclipse Genie.