| Summary: | [discussion] plugin design/structure for the activity tracing project | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | z_Archived | Reporter: | Timur Achmetow <achmetow84> | ||||||||
| Component: | Mylyn | Assignee: | Steffen Pingel <steffen.pingel> | ||||||||
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||||||
| Severity: | enhancement | ||||||||||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | steffen.pingel | ||||||||
| Version: | unspecified | ||||||||||
| Target Milestone: | 3.9 | ||||||||||
| Hardware: | PC | ||||||||||
| OS: | Windows 7 | ||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||||
| Bug Depends on: | |||||||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 376233 | ||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||
|
Description
Timur Achmetow
I want to list here the needed dependencies for this project. For the GIT commits (task 378097) I need the following plugins: - o.e.m.versions.core - o.e.m.versions.tasks.core - o.e.m.versions.tasks.mapper.generic For the Gerrit review (task 378101) data: - o.e.m.tasks.core - o.e.m.tasks.index.core If I would create a new plugin, then both features need the task ui plugin: - o.e.m.tasks.ui As a first step we could create a new plugin with the above dependencies. This should work. It is possible to extend the Task Editor from another plugins? For example: Extend the Task Editor through a new section? If not, in the first step, we could extend the Task Editor throug a new tab, like "Context" or "BugZilla". Created attachment 217388 [details]
extended task editor
In the screenshot you will see the current task editor, which I have extend through a new tab (Activity).
Created attachment 217457 [details]
Dependencies of the new plugin
In the figure the dependencies are shown.
The idea of this looks very good. I think we should consider extensibility right from the get go though use an extension point to separate some of the dependencies. Here is my suggestion: o.e.m.tasks.activity.core - data model for activity records (i.e. an event that is associated with a task) - cache for activity records (future) - core extension for activity providers o.e.m.tasks.activity.ui - Task Editor contribution - Label providers etc. - ui extension for activity providers (future) The tasks bundles should only have dependencies on commons and tasks. The changes sets that are provided by o.e.m.versions.tasks... would be contributed through the extension point. This would enable other providers such as task repositories to contribute that information as well. Okay ... the idea with core and ui makes absolutely sense! In which Repo I have to upload the bundles? Tasks? If we agree on the structure I'll go ahead an create the bundles in the tasks repository and then you can create patches against them. Okay, if nobody has objections please create the bundles in the tasks repo and I would push my changes to Gerrit. I have added both bundles to the org.eclipse.mylyn.tasks repository in master. (In reply to comment #9) > I have added both bundles to the org.eclipse.mylyn.tasks repository in master. Oh yes great! Thank you! Created attachment 218117 [details]
plugin dependencies
in the screenshot are the current plugin dependencies shown.
I like the visual appearance and this looks like the data that we want to show in the table. I was however thinking that each build would be it's own row and all records to be sorted chronologically. The goal being that if I submit a change set I would see the build triggered by that in the row below intermixed with comments on the task and code reviews etc. (In reply to comment #12) > all records to be sorted chronologically. Okay, no problem. (In reply to comment #12) > I was however thinking that each build would be it's own row and > all records to be sorted chronologically. The goal being that if I submit a > change set I would see the build triggered by that in the row below intermixed > with comments on the task and code reviews etc. Hm ... can you give me an example? Sorry, mixed up the bugs. I responded on bug 383023. I think we have converged on the basics: The o.e.m.tasks.activity.core/ui bundles will provide the activity framework with caching and extensibility for activity providers (bug 385127). |