Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 377154

Summary:

[Nested UML Compare] Comparison between 2 elements which don't have the same parent is not done properly

Product:

[Modeling] Papyrus

Reporter:

Vincent Lorenzo <vincent.lorenzo>

Component:

Core

Assignee:

Vincent Lorenzo <vincent.lorenzo>

Status:

CLOSED FIXED

QA Contact:

Severity:

normal

Priority:

Version:

0.9.0

Target Milestone:

Hardware:

All

OS:

All

Whiteboard:

Bug Depends on:

Bug Blocks:

371606

Attachments:

Description	Flags
A snapshot of the bad result	none

Description Vincent Lorenzo

2012-04-19 04:19:07 EDT

Steps to reproduce : 
	1/ Create a new model
	2/ Create a new Class called Class1
	3/ Create a new Package called Package1
	4/ Create a new Class in Package1, called Class2
	5/ Create a new Property in Class2, called Property1
	6/ Compare Class1 and Class2
		-> 2 changes in the model : 
			- Class1 has been added
			- Class2 has been removed
			-> the system seems to compare the owner of Class1 and Class2 instead of the classes themselves.

Comment 1 Vincent Lorenzo

2012-04-19 04:21:54 EDT

Created attachment 214223 [details]
A snapshot of the bad result

Comment 2 Vincent Lorenzo

2012-04-19 04:25:57 EDT

R7932 : share the project NestedCompare_DifferentParentExample in trunk/sandbox/NestedCompare

Comment 3 Vincent Lorenzo

2012-04-19 08:09:10 EDT

In R7939 : 
	create the class UMLDiffEngine, UMLDiffService,UMLMatchEngine, UMLSimilarityChecker in oep.uml.compare.
These classes allows to correct the default of EMF-Compare to compare 2 elements owned by the same resource.

Comment 4 Vincent Lorenzo

2012-04-19 08:24:28 EDT

R7941 : a small fix to avoid NPE

Comment 5 Vincent Lorenzo

2012-04-26 09:22:38 EDT

R7972 : 
Changes the methods to get the label provider
Remove the possibility to use the Transaction content merge viewer in the stanrd EMF-Compare 
Provides an Undo/Redo for the nested and the standalone editor

Comment 6 Vincent Lorenzo

2012-06-29 06:00:45 EDT

This bug can be marked as closed fixed