Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 37219

Summary:	Rename type should update derived variable name [refactoring]
Product:	[Eclipse Project] JDT	Reporter:	Dirk Baeumer <dirk_baeumer>
Component:	UI	Assignee:	Philip Mayer <eclipsetalk2>
Status:	VERIFIED FIXED	QA Contact:
Severity:	normal
Priority:	P3	CC:	channingwalton, david_fire4, eclipse, ed.burnette, ekuleshov, markus.kell.r, mlists
Version:	2.1
Target Milestone:	3.2 M4
Hardware:	PC
OS:	Windows XP
Whiteboard:
Bug Depends on:	110336
Bug Blocks:

Description Dirk Baeumer

2003-05-05 10:58:28 EDT

2.1

Rename type Edit to type TextEdit should update variable names of form "Edit 
edit" to "TextEdit textEdit". Name prefixes and suffixes should be considered 
as well.

Comment 1 Dirk Baeumer

2003-05-05 10:58:44 EDT

3.0 planning.

Comment 2 Dirk Baeumer

2005-02-03 06:00:14 EST

*** Bug 84308 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Dirk Baeumer

2005-03-08 04:12:46 EST

*** Bug 87339 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Eugene Kuleshov

2005-03-08 10:14:03 EST

Dirk, two years is a long time. Is there are any plans to actually resolve this
in 3.1 stream?

Comment 5 Eugene Kuleshov

2005-03-08 10:17:20 EST

Just for the record. As I mentioned in 87339, this enhancement should detect a
pertial match such as session for JmsSession, etc.

Comment 6 Dirk Baeumer

2005-03-08 12:48:51 EST

Unfortunatelly, our current focus for 3.1 is J2SE 5.0. As long as we have open
issues there we will not tackle new feature.

Comment 7 Dirk Baeumer

2005-03-09 08:59:23 EST

*** Bug 59903 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Eugene Kuleshov

2005-03-09 10:36:52 EST

Another handy feature would be to find methods that return a renamed type and
offer to rename them too if name has complete or partial match with class name.

I also would like to clarify variable renaming. Matching variable names should
include local variables, method parameters and fields. Static field names may
need special handling because of upper case and underscores.

Comment 9 Markus Keller

2005-09-30 05:43:21 EDT

Reopen.

Comment 10 Markus Keller

2005-12-06 05:52:42 EST

This has been implemented.

I think all comments have been handled, except for the static fields in comment 8. Please open a separate bug with a concrete example if you think this is an issue.

Comment 11 Channing Walton

2005-12-06 15:30:01 EST

(In reply to comment #10)
> This has been implemented.

Great, thanks :-)

Comment 12 Benno Baumgartner

2005-12-13 05:31:40 EST

verifing...

Comment 13 Benno Baumgartner

2005-12-13 05:55:19 EST

verified in I20051213-0010