| Summary: | New library code generator for database access | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | z_Archived | Reporter: | Song Fan <songfan> |
| Component: | EDT | Assignee: | Song Fan <songfan> |
| Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | chenzhh, jinfahua, smythew, songfan |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows XP | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 370673 | ||
|
Description
Song Fan
Hi Will,
I'm wondering if the source for the library would look almost same as the service code.
For example:
library TestDBAccessLibrary
dataSource SQLDataSource? { @Resource{uri = "abc"}};
use ConditionHandlingLib;
//same as the add functions with Service
function addXXX
end
//same as the get functions with Service
function getXXX
end
//other CRUD functions...
end
I *think* the code is identical, other than the part type is "library" instead of "service". fixed close |