| Summary: | Evaluate if Request recycling is still valid? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [RT] Jetty | Reporter: | Greg Wilkins <gregw> |
| Component: | server | Assignee: | Project Inbox <jetty-inbox> |
| Status: | CLOSED MOVED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | jesse.mcconnell, jetty-inbox, simone.bordet |
| Version: | 8.1.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | 9.0.x | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Greg Wilkins
In addition to the comment above, we need to investigate if recycling of data contained in the request object is effective. The HTTP headers name/values will sum up for a large amount of memory occupied by each request, so using interned strings for those may be more effective than recycling the request object that wraps them. Evaluations in Jetty-9 have show |