| Summary: | preferences page - visual nits | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [ECD] Orion | Reporter: | Susan McCourt <susan> |
| Component: | Client | Assignee: | Anton McConville <antonm> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | ||
| Version: | 0.4 | ||
| Target Milestone: | 0.4 M2 | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows 7 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Susan McCourt
Thinking about it some more: - I think that the heading that says "Categories" is not really needed. The page title says "Settings" and I think the nav elements are self explanatory. - We should have a splitter bar so the user can adjust the left/right position - Rethinking the selection color....I wonder how white would look? It might make it look more integrated with the content on the right (though the splitter might interfere with that). Just a thought. Will still have Linda look at it. I have fixes for the selection color - I took the .checkedRow color - white didn't seem visually appealing. I like this checkedRow color - subtle yet obvious which is selected, I think it works fine for now. Changed the cursor modified the Orion dots - I sampled the logo color and made some initial plugin icons with plugs in them. We can request a more professionally designed logo for sure. As for the other comments, please can we address them as we evolve the plugins feature? I'd like to think about the title - it plays a little bit of a role in the JSON definition - so I'd like it there as a clue/guideline for now, and also, can we tackle the re-sizable partition when we have more content and so need it - I'd rather this work item didn't turn into a growing list of tweaks :) I think we're at a good starting point, and I'd like to focus on some other items that I think could be a bit more useful for now. https://github.com/antonmc/orion.client The changes look great! This is definitely an improvement and the icon will be fine. I will have a designer look at it stylistically but it's certainly good enough! (In reply to comment #2) > As for the other comments, please can we address them as we evolve the plugins > feature? I'd like to think about the title - it plays a little bit of a role in > the JSON definition - so I'd like it there as a clue/guideline for now, and > also, can we tackle the re-sizable partition when we have more content and so > need it - I'd rather this work item didn't turn into a growing list of tweaks > :) Ha! The sooner you fix the bug the sooner I have to stop adding to it! I understand. Perhaps we can address the splitter and heading part in bug 368848 when we have more instances of the pattern. I agree with not using it til the content warrants, but if we use this pattern in other places (like repo page) I could definitely see the need. |