| Summary: | The protocol could make it easier to support native clients implementing the zIndex. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [RT] RAP | Reporter: | Johannes Eickhold <jeick> |
| Component: | RWT | Assignee: | Project Inbox <rap-inbox> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | ivan, jboehme, rsternberg |
| Version: | 1.5 | ||
| Target Milestone: | 1.5 M5 | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Johannes Eickhold
I agree that we should change the way z-order is synchronized. In SWT, widgets doesn't have an explicit z-index. The z-order of a control is defined by its position in its parent's list of children. Hence, transmitting the z-index property in the protocol is more specific than actually needed. Now, we a rendering a "children" property (array with ids) for every composite. The array order specify the zIndex - first control is on the top. Changes are in CVS HEAD. |