Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
| Summary: | Need to update to latest Jetty 8.1 RC for M5 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Eclipse Project] Platform | Reporter: | Thomas Watson <tjwatson> |
| Component: | Releng | Assignee: | Kim Moir <kim.moir> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | jesse.mcconnell, john.arthorne, kim.moir |
| Version: | 4.2 | ||
| Target Milestone: | 3.8 M5 | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Mac OS X - Carbon (unsup.) | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Thomas Watson
We are shooting for 8.1.0 final release next week and intend on having this be what goes into juno. I'll ping this issue when it goes final and we have a p2 repo with the goods (In reply to comment #1) > We are shooting for 8.1.0 final release next week and intend on having this be > what goes into juno. > > I'll ping this issue when it goes final and we have a p2 repo with the goods Anything available yet? Is this the repo we should use: http://download.eclipse.org/jetty/updates/jetty-bundles-8.x/8.1.0.RC4 Yes that should work the final release is probably another week to two out and we'll probably have another M5 release end of this week, start of next week but the url there should work from here on out for M4 release (In reply to comment #4) > Yes that should work > > the final release is probably another week to two out and we'll probably have > another M5 release end of this week, start of next week but the url there > should work from here on out for M4 release To be clear this is for the Juno M5 milestone. Is the Jetty 8.1.0 RC4 version what you are contributing to Juno M5? err yes, I believe that is the plan and I misspoke, its RC4 and a new RC5 coming soonish the only change in RC5 that might effect things would be the removal of explicit javax.activation dependencies in the 8 codebase because its present in jdk 1.6 and above which is jetty8 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=368593 for details on that When you have your final 8.1.0 release are you going to keep the RCx qualifiers or remove them? they will be kept, perhaps moved to archives.eclipse.org but they will be kept (In reply to comment #6) > err yes, I believe that is the plan > > and I misspoke, its RC4 and a new RC5 coming soonish > > the only change in RC5 that might effect things would be the removal of > explicit javax.activation dependencies in the 8 codebase because its present in > jdk 1.6 and above which is jetty8 > > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=368593 for details on that Thanks Jesse, but I still would like to understand what version of Jetty 8.1.0 you plan to contribute to Juno M5. Is that the jetty 8.1.0 RC4 build? We don't have a lot of runway to wait, unfortunately. I think our only option is to use your jetty 8.1.0 M4 content since we are starting our Juno M5 builds this Friday. (In reply to comment #8) > they will be kept, perhaps moved to archives.eclipse.org but they will be kept Thanks, but my question was in the repo that contains your final 8.1.0 build, will it contain versions with RCx qualifiers or will you remove the qualifiers? 8.1.0.v2012<whatever> will be a release of the code on the jetty-8 tag in git when we are comfortable with the code on that branch it will not be renaming jars or anything like that, it will simply be taking our released maven artifacts and rejiggering them into a p2 repository cheers, jesse doc bundle http://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.common.git/commit/?id=dfab71beae5d987e60d60a03eb16a96b9a6806d4 maps http://git.eclipse.org/c/platform/eclipse.platform.releng.maps.git/commit/?id=0d8576a9c04ae85bcf2a5b636180945c44a3ec29 Fixed for N20120118-2000. |