| Summary: | Boost pointer container iterator auto-indirection causes false positive CODAN bug markers | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Tools] CDT | Reporter: | Kim van der Riet <kim.vdriet> | ||||
| Component: | cdt-indexer | Assignee: | Project Inbox <cdt-indexer-inbox> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Markus Schorn <mschorn.eclipse> | ||||
| Severity: | normal | ||||||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | cdtdoug, overholt | ||||
| Version: | 8.0 | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | PC | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Kim van der Riet
Created attachment 209066 [details]
Reproducer illustrating syntax analysis problem
Create a C++ project with this file as the source. See comments in source for further details.
This file does not do anything useful; it does compile successfully using g++.
what version of CDT are you using? Sorry, I thought the build id was sufficient. I am not an Eclipse insider, I find the different version numbers for all the CDT bits confusing, so I don't know which one you are looking for... I assume this is the one: Eclipse C/C++ Development Tools 8.0.0.201106081058 but in case it is not, here are the other CDT bits listed: C/C++ Remote Debug Launcher 6.0.0.201106081058 Eclipse GCC Cross Compiler Support 1.0.0.201106081058 Eclipse CDT P2 Customizations for SDK installation 1.0.0.201106081058 CDT Debugger Services Framework (DSF) Examples 2.1.0.201106081058 Eclipse C/C++ Development Tools 8.0.0.201106081058 Eclipse C/C++ Development Tools Utilities 5.1.0.201106081058 Eclipse GDB Hardware Debugging 7.0.0.201106081058 Eclipse Debugger for C/C++ 2.0.0.201106081058 GDB Common 7.0.0.201106081058 Reproduced the problem (boost 1.46.1 and CDT 8.0.1) and verified that it works on the master branch. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 187989 *** I suspect the bug id got mixed up when marking the bug as a duplicate. (In reply to comment #5) > I suspect the bug id got mixed up when marking the bug as a duplicate. Thanks, I mistyped the bug id. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 197989 *** |