| Summary: | [navigation] Hide "imports" elements in Outline and Members view by default | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Eclipse Project] JDT | Reporter: | Andrey Loskutov <loskutov> |
| Component: | Text | Assignee: | Dani Megert <daniel_megert> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | daniel_megert, remy.suen |
| Version: | 3.8 | ||
| Target Milestone: | 3.8 M5 | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Andrey Loskutov
Completely agree for the imports. I'll fix this in the 'Outline' and 'Members' view. The package declaration is a bit different, as it allows to quickly see in which package one currently works. See also bug 82059 comment 2 for another explanation why we keep it. I've adjusted the summary accordingly. Fixed in master: ff0500704e70fbfabe981d20f33ef453b26f4964 Dani, I actually wanted to have *both* things to be hidden. Package can be seen by the breadcrumb on the top of the editor. I do not think that we should use Outline view as a placeholder for the package information - it is clearly more about navigation to something. I never "navigated" to the package. So we have package shown in Package explorer + breadcrumb + outline view => too much of same information. Should I open another bug for it? (In reply to comment #3) > Dani, > I actually wanted to have *both* things to be hidden. I know ;-). > Package can be seen by > the breadcrumb on the top of the editor. Nope. We are talking about the default behavior here. Like the package can be seen in the breadcrumb it can also be hidden in the Outline by changing the defaults. If we decide in the future to show the breadcrumb by default, then we would remove it from the Outline. > I do not think that we should use > Outline view as a placeholder for the package information - it is clearly more > about navigation to something. I never "navigated" to the package. It's an outline of the CU. Some use it to navigate but some also use it to get a structural view of the CU. > So we have > package shown in Package explorer + breadcrumb + outline view => too much of > same information. > Should I open another bug for it? Yes, please file one to have the breadcrumb shown by default and mention the package filters. (In reply to comment #4) > Yes, please file one to have the breadcrumb shown by default and mention the > package filters. Created bug 366498 |