| Summary: | Typo | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | z_Archived | Reporter: | Bob NIcholson <bob> |
| Component: | EDT | Assignee: | Project Inbox <edt.doc-inbox> |
| Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | margolis |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows 7 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Bob NIcholson
You use the @ operator when you are declaring an instance of an annotation type. The statement might say, "To generate the Java code that is appropriate for the SQL operation, the EDT Java generator uses annotations that are based on the Table, ID, GeneratedValue, and Column annotation types." By the way, the word "part" should be removed from EGL doc except for the description of how to extend the generator. (In that case, the word is in the software.) For example, Employee is a Record type. Changed the text at the bottom of this file: http://wiki.eclipse.org/EDT:Tutorial:_RUI_With_DataBase_Lesson_3 Also, removed references to "part" elsewhere. updated to show that this defect was fixed in 0.8.0 I1. |