Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 365349

Summary:

EJB project mapped to WEB-INF/lib of web project is imported as utility project

Product:

[WebTools] WTP Java EE Tools

Reporter:

Salvador Zalapa <zalapa>

Component:

jst.j2ee

Assignee:

Salvador Zalapa <zalapa>

Status:

RESOLVED FIXED

QA Contact:

Chuck Bridgham <cbridgha>

Severity:

normal

Priority:

CC:

ccc, shr31223

Version:

unspecified

Flags:

cbridgha: review+
ccc: review+

Target Milestone:

3.2.5 P

Hardware:

OS:

Windows XP

Whiteboard:

Bug Depends on:

Bug Blocks:

366644

Attachments:

Description	Flags
EAR sample	none
Patch	none
Second version patch	shr31223: iplog+

Description Salvador Zalapa

2011-12-01 13:39:39 EST

Build Identifier: 3.2.5

Since EJBs in WAS is part of the EJB 3.1 specification, a EJB project mapped to WEB-INF/lib is a valid scenario, however when EJB jar if the EJB jar is imported as project, it is as Utility project instead of an EJB project.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Import the attached EAR file. Import the EJB as project.
2.Check the facets of the project EJB project. You will see the project is an utility project.

Comment 1 Salvador Zalapa

2011-12-01 13:41:35 EST

Created attachment 207805 [details]
EAR sample

Comment 2 Salvador Zalapa

2011-12-01 13:42:57 EST

Created attachment 207806 [details]
Patch

Comment 3 Chuck Bridgham

2011-12-07 13:17:55 EST

approved

Comment 4 Carl Anderson

2011-12-07 14:34:54 EST

Chava, this works in the development environment, but will fail to compile in the build, since org.eclipse.jst.j2ee.web cannot prereq org.eclipse.jst.j2ee.ejb.  Please replace the usage of EJBComponentImportDataModelProvider with something along the lines of:

if (EarModuleManager.hasEJBModuleExtension())
{
localModel = EarModuleManager.getEJBModuleExtension().createImportDataModel();
}
else // just treat it like a utility
{
localModel = DataModelFactory.createDataModel(new J2EEUtilityJarImportDataModelProvider());
}

That alleviates the need for the dependency on the EJB plugin.

Comment 5 Salvador Zalapa

2011-12-07 15:33:45 EST

Created attachment 208068 [details]
Second version patch

Comment 6 Salvador Zalapa

2011-12-07 15:34:12 EST

Attaching a new version patch.

Comment 7 Chuck Bridgham

2011-12-07 15:59:03 EST

thanks looks better

Comment 8 Roberto Sanchez Herrera

2012-01-03 11:33:25 EST

Code committed to R3_2_5_patches. Resolving bug