Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 364403

Summary:

The "visual editor" is called the "Rich UI editor."

Product:

z_Archived

Reporter:

Ben Margolis <margolis>

Component:

EDT

Assignee:

Tony Chen <chenzhh>

Status:

CLOSED FIXED

QA Contact:

Severity:

minor

Priority:

CC:

chenzhh, smythew, svihovec, tdramsey

Version:

unspecified

Target Milestone:

---

Hardware:

OS:

Windows XP

Whiteboard:

Attachments:

Description	Flags
text fix patch	lasher: iplog+
screen shot after fix	none

Description Ben Margolis

2011-11-21 13:25:32 EST

The doc has long spoken of the "Rich UI editor" rather than the "Visual editor"; but the Rich UI appearance preference uses the second phrase.

The box at the bottom should say "Render engine for the Rich UI editor", and we don't need any phrase thereafter, even "Select the render engine used by the Rich UI editor".

Comment 1 Ben Margolis

2011-11-21 15:44:43 EST

also, "Use default rendering engine" should say "Use default render engine" or (better) "Use default."

Comment 2 Tony Chen

2011-11-22 08:13:53 EST

Created attachment 207353 [details]
text fix patch

Comment 3 Tony Chen

2011-11-22 08:14:32 EST

Created attachment 207354 [details]
screen shot after fix

Comment 4 Tony Chen

2011-11-22 08:16:34 EST

Brian, here's the fix to some UI text changes proposed by Saul. Can this go into 0.7. It should not impact any function.

Comment 5 Brian Svihovec

2011-11-22 09:06:00 EST

I am fine with the change in comment 1.

My only concern with changing the 'Rich UI Editor' to 'Visual Editor' is that there could be a point in the future where there is more than one 'Visual Editor', and it would be difficult to determine which editor these preferences were for at that time.  

I have cc'd Will and Theresa for their opinion.

Comment 6 Ben Margolis

2011-11-22 09:50:54 EST

The name is and should be the Rich UI editor, not the Visual editor.

Comment 7 Theresa Ramsey

2011-11-22 11:02:01 EST

We've been using "Rich UI editor" and "Visual editor" almost interchangeably, but let's pick one term.  "Rich UI editor" seems the most clear. Plus, someone may add another visual editor not for RUI in the future. :-)

Comment 8 Brian Svihovec

2011-11-22 17:03:44 EST

We will resolve this after .7.

Comment 9 Tony Chen

2011-12-29 21:19:07 EST

Fixed

Comment 10 Ben Margolis

2012-01-13 16:35:18 EST

Zhang Hong, I am looking at this:

EGL Web Developer Tools	
   0.8.0.v201201130904-1CT-Fiv5_M5_LMsfUbc

and the preference says "Visual Editor." 

Should I only be looking at the .7 stream?

Comment 11 Tony Chen

2012-01-15 22:02:28 EST

Saul, my bad, the fix missed some changes. I've committed the expected text. 

You are right to use the 0.8 code stream, there's no .7 stream. 



(In reply to comment #10)
> Zhang Hong, I am looking at this:
> 
> EGL Web Developer Tools    
>    0.8.0.v201201130904-1CT-Fiv5_M5_LMsfUbc
> 
> and the preference says "Visual Editor." 
> 
> Should I only be looking at the .7 stream?

Comment 12 Ben Margolis

2012-02-20 10:40:11 EST

confirmed in a mid-February build.