Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
| Summary: | CONST parameter modifier shouldn't be allowed with the inOut modifier | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | z_Archived | Reporter: | Kathy Carroll <carrollk> | ||||
| Component: | EDT | Assignee: | Project Inbox <edt.compiler-inbox> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | normal | ||||||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | pharmon | ||||
| Version: | unspecified | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | PC | ||||||
| OS: | Windows XP | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
Created attachment 206840 [details]
eunit library
Paul,
I was wrong. Both generators are OK with CONST INOUT parameter specification. The issue I see is with +=. I tried this code in RBD and got this validation message:
IWN.VAL.6646.e 28/6 driver - Invalid attempt to modify incoming which is a constant. Constants are not allowed to be modified.
EDT doesn't give me an error.
function testForPaul(){@Test}
outgoing string = "before";
called(outgoing);
LogResult.assertStringEqual1("before", outgoing);
end
function called(incoming string const inout)
action string = incoming + " more stuff";
incoming += " after";
end
I have fixed the validation so that it will now give an error when using the += assignment with Const strings. Change was made to AssignmentStatementValidator verified 20111115_2101 and closed |
This method declaration function calledReturning(outgoing string const out) results in this validation error IWN.VAL.4958.e 44/30 The const modifier is not allowed to be specified with the out modifier. However this doesn't give me any validation error function called(incoming string const inout) Seems like a valid restriction to added since it is along the line of these two languages changes: Literals are no longer allowed to be passed to INOUT function parms. Constants are no longer allowed to be passed to INOUT function parameters. Otherwise, both generators have issues.