| Summary: | [releng] Where are the GIT tags for 3.1.1 and M-builds? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Modeling] OCL | Reporter: | Ed Willink <ed> |
| Component: | Core | Assignee: | OCL Inbox <mdt-ocl-inbox> |
| Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | major | ||
| Priority: | P3 | ||
| Version: | 3.2.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows Vista | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Ed Willink
No idea about you mention of GIT behaviour. Anyway... There is an already created R3_1_1 tag for Indigio SR1. Concerning milestones.... I've only found a couple of pattern for milestones which I really dislike: M2_13 M6_12 Do you have any preference ? Some alternatives: - 4_0_M3 - Juno_M3 - S4_0_M3 Cheers, Adolfo. (In reply to comment #1) > No idea about you mention of GIT behaviour. > > Anyway... There is an already created R3_1_1 tag for Indigio SR1. I can't see it. May be you need to PUSH. > Do you have any preference ? Some alternatives: > > - 4_0_M3 > - Juno_M3 > - S4_0_M3 I was going to continue R3_1 etc, but with plugins diverging the major version number is meaningless, so I prefer Juno_M3, Juno_RC1, Juno_SR2_RC3 Ed, As you said the tags were created in my local repository, but they had not been pushed. I have just pushed the following tags: R3_1 R3_1_1 Juno_M4_Core Juno_m4_Tools P.S: I think we could keep the RX_X convention for the final release. Resolving as fixed. CLOSED after a year in the RESOLVED state. |