Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 362933

Summary:	Refactoring not updating all DD files
Product:	z_Archived	Reporter:	Justin Spadea <jspadea>
Component:	EDT	Assignee:	Zhi Zhu <zhuzhi>
Status:	CLOSED FIXED	QA Contact:
Severity:	normal
Priority:	P3	CC:	chenzhh
Version:	unspecified
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	PC
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:

Description Justin Spadea

2011-11-04 14:32:08 EDT

1. Create a general project called "dot.test".
2. Add a service and a RUIHandler.
3. Add the service to the DD as a REST service.
4. Now go to the RUI tab and deselect 'Deploy all Rich UI Handlers' and select the handler you created.
5. Copy the DD file and paste it into the same location. In my case I now had two files: "dot_test.egldd" and "Copy of dot_test.egldd".
6. Refactor > Rename the service. It updated "Copy of dot_test.egldd" but not "dot_test.egldd".
7. Refactor > Rename the handler. It updated "Copy of dot_test.egldd" but not "dot_test.egldd".

Comment 1 Justin Spadea

2011-11-04 14:33:18 EDT

If you delete the files, they are removed from "Copy of dot_test.egldd" but not from "dot_test.egldd"

Comment 2 Tony Chen

2011-11-07 01:23:17 EST

I think we should update all the dd files in the same project. I'm setting the priority to p3 meaning it's not a must have for 0.7.

Comment 3 Zhi Zhu

2011-11-07 01:34:26 EST

Is it reasonable to put service/handler binding in more than one DD file?

Comment 4 Justin Spadea

2011-11-07 09:11:47 EST

Yes, you might use one DD to deploy the services, and another DD to deploy the RUIHandlers. Users can have as many DDs as they want.

Comment 5 Zhi Zhu

2011-11-07 19:33:24 EST

I mean the fact that you put the same service binding in different DD files is reasonable or not?

Comment 6 Justin Spadea

2011-11-08 09:02:02 EST

Whether it's reasonable or not there's nothing to stop you from doing that, so refactoring should handle it.

I'm sure some business out there has a case where they want some services on server1 (external) and other services (including a couple of the same as before) on server2 (internal).

Comment 7 Zhi Zhu

2011-11-08 19:32:25 EST

Okay, will handle the scenario you described here

Comment 8 Zhi Zhu

2011-11-09 00:53:15 EST

RefactoringExecutionStarter

Comment 9 Justin Spadea

2011-11-22 16:24:23 EST

Verified