| Summary: | Create Patch... dialog should not set file location | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Technology] EGit | Reporter: | Dani Megert <daniel_megert> |
| Component: | UI | Assignee: | Dani Megert <daniel_megert> |
| Status: | VERIFIED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | daniel_megert, markus.kell.r, matthias.sohn, remy.suen |
| Version: | 1.2 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Dani Megert
To be more precise: it can set the file location but use the previous value and not some hard-coded path. This annoys me as well. http://egit.eclipse.org/r/4453 pushed for review. merged as c68ec77bde3d770a20ca7ebd0d8e3963b03b2f0c (In reply to comment #3) > http://egit.eclipse.org/r/4453 pushed for review. This change set appears to have broken the build. The build verifies our 3.6 compatibility by building against 3.6.2. It seems that a 3.7 API was used to fix this bug. [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.eclipse.tycho:tycho-compiler-plugin:0.12.0:compile (default-compile) on project org.eclipse.egit.ui: Compilation failure: Compilation failure: [ERROR] <https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/egit/ws/org.eclipse.egit.ui/src/org/eclipse/egit/ui/internal/history/GitCreatePatchWizard.java> (at line 106):[-1,-1] [ERROR] setDialogSettings(DialogSettings.getOrCreateSection(Activator.getDefault().getDialogSettings(), "GitCreatePatchWizard")); //$NON-NLS-1$ [ERROR] ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [ERROR] The method getOrCreateSection(IDialogSettings, String) is undefined for the type DialogSettings [ERROR] -> [Help 1] (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #3) > > http://egit.eclipse.org/r/4453 pushed for review. > > This change set appears to have broken the build. The build verifies our 3.6 > compatibility by building against 3.6.2. It seems that a 3.7 API was used to > fix this bug. Yep. Why did the first Hudson test run result in +1? I saw that in http://wiki.eclipse.org/EGit/Contributor_Guide it says: > Eclipse Platform 3.5 as minimum requirements I thought this is a typo. Is it really targeting 3.5? I can attach a new patch once it's clear whether 3.5, 3.6, 3.6.1 or 3.6.2 is the target. (In reply to comment #6) > Yep. Why did the first Hudson test run result in +1? I am also curious about this. Perhaps we need a new bug to investigate this. > I saw that in http://wiki.eclipse.org/EGit/Contributor_Guide it says: > > Eclipse Platform 3.5 as minimum requirements > I thought this is a typo. Is it really targeting 3.5? It is open for discussion right now though that is what we have down at the moment. http://wiki.eclipse.org/EGit/FAQ#What_versions_of_Eclipse_does_EGit_target.3F Pushed http://egit.eclipse.org/r/4534 which fixes the incompatibility. merged as 2112f56b0a6968e25100c20401047ac1496ec2ae Verified in 201111061513. |