| Summary: | Add GC.textExtent(String string, int flags) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [RT] RAP | Reporter: | Tobias Liefke <eclipse> |
| Component: | RWT | Assignee: | Project Inbox <rap-inbox> |
| Status: | ASSIGNED --- | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | igor.novakovic |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Tobias Liefke
I agree that we can implement this method. > As text measurement in RAP is not as accurate ... The text size measurement *is* accurate in RAP. The exact sizes are measured on the client and reported back to the server. > We can ignore the flags for now and just return the same result as the > first method (maybe add a "TODO" for inspecting the flags later). I don't think that we have to ignore the flags. We should be able to support them by applying the requested changes to the text (such as replacement of mnemonics) before measuring. |