Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 36043

Summary: [CVS Repo View] Folders & Modules mixed in CVS Repositories -> Versions
Product: [Eclipse Project] Platform Reporter: neil_buesing
Component: CVSAssignee: platform-cvs-inbox <platform-cvs-inbox>
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX QA Contact:
Severity: normal    
Priority: P3 CC: d.neary, paduffy
Version: 2.1Keywords: helpwanted
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: PC   
OS: Windows 2000   
Whiteboard:

Description neil_buesing CLA 2003-04-03 16:50:48 EST
If there is a module name that is identical to a folder name in CVS, it shows up
twice in the Versions listing.  

Now, the HEAD stream has the same scenario, but the icon for folders is
different than the icon for modules, and the folders and modules are grouped
separately.

In the "Versions" folder.  The icon for folder and modules are the same and they
are not separated at all.  It appears that the folder can be expanded to get a
list of all of the versions.  However, expanding the module selection shows nothing.

Here is an example below.  Wherease ProjectA and ProjectB are folders as well as
modules.  When the second "+ ProjectB" is expanded it becomse "  ProjectB".

- :pserver:user@host:/cvsroot
  + HEAD
  + Branches
  - Versions
    + ProjectA
    + ProjectA
    - ProjectB
      + ProjectB v2_0
      + ProjectB v1_0
      ProjectB
    + ProjectC
    + ProjectD

I figure the icon difference and grouping in the HEAD folder should be the same
in the Version folder.  I don't know what should be expected when expanding the
second "ProjectB".
Comment 1 Michael Valenta CLA 2003-04-07 09:49:12 EDT
We should have a second icon and sort in the same order as in HEAD.
Comment 2 Michael Valenta CLA 2003-04-08 16:32:20 EDT
*** Bug 36238 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Michael Valenta CLA 2003-04-10 10:54:44 EDT
Sorting change has been release to R2_1_maintenance branch
Comment 4 Michael Valenta CLA 2003-05-13 11:42:48 EDT
We've done all we can for 2.1.1. We will address in full for 3.0
Comment 5 Michael Valenta CLA 2004-05-14 22:17:14 EDT
Won't have time for this in 3.0. Deferring.
Comment 6 Michael Valenta CLA 2004-11-08 22:25:22 EST
*** Bug 35823 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Michael Valenta CLA 2005-05-09 14:47:32 EDT
There is currently no plan to address this item.
Comment 8 Denis Roy CLA 2009-08-30 02:19:46 EDT
As of now 'LATER' and 'REMIND' resolutions are no longer supported.
Please reopen this bug if it is still valid for you.