Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
| Summary: | History view should also name branches when filtered by resources | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Technology] EGit | Reporter: | Markus Keller <markus.kell.r> | ||||
| Component: | UI | Assignee: | Project Inbox <egit.ui-inbox> | ||||
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | enhancement | ||||||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | daniel_megert | ||||
| Version: | 1.2 | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | PC | ||||||
| OS: | Windows 7 | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
I think the reason is that you have selected the filter "Show all changes of selected resource and its children". The selected resource is "ConvertForLoopOperation.java". I guess that this is not changed in the HEAD commit of your local master branch. (In reply to comment #1) Yes, that explains it. Changing this bug into a request to also show the branch name on the tip if the HEAD commit has been filtered. The commit list in the screenshot doesn't show the branches, but that would be useful information. The rendering should be different from the normal green background to make it clear that this is not the HEAD on that branch. Maybe gray bg as the origin/master branch? +1 good idea > The rendering should be different from the normal
> green background to make it clear that this is not the HEAD on that branch.
> Maybe gray bg as the origin/master branch?
Better use a different color. Gray would be confusing, since the branch doesn't really end on that commit.
|
Created attachment 204438 [details] Screenshot 1.2.0.201109290051 The History view list doesn't show the HEAD of my local master branch after I performed "Fetch from Upstream" (but didn't pull yet). For the screenshot, I selected the state in my working directory. You can see the branches in the comment pane, but not in the list of commits.