| Summary: | Refactor-Rename/Move confusion | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Eclipse Project] Platform | Reporter: | Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg> |
| Component: | Resources | Assignee: | Platform-Resources-Inbox <platform-resources-inbox> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | daniel_megert, remy.suen |
| Version: | 3.7.1 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Mac OS X - Carbon (unsup.) | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Robin Rosenberg
(In reply to comment #0) > Project in workspace. Move e.f. workspace/A to workspace/B (or any other > single-segment name instead of B) is not allowed. Did you mean "instead of A"? Please rephrase, Robin. > Project outside workspace; Move of /Users/me/git/Z to /Users/me/git/Z, as > expeted, moves the project to Z but does not rename it. Those two paths look the same to me. Did you mean some different path? Robin, since you opened this bug against the UI I'm guessing you're meaning that the wrong parameters are being passed and that this is not a bug in the Resources layer? (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > Project in workspace. Move e.f. workspace/A to workspace/B (or any other > > single-segment name instead of B) is not allowed. > > Did you mean "instead of A"? Please rephrase, Robin. Project in workspace. Move e.f. workspace/A to workspace/B. An attempt to move the project to any single-segment name is disallowed. > > > Project outside workspace; Move of /Users/me/git/Z to /Users/me/git/Z, as > > expeted, moves the project to Z but does not rename it. > > Those two paths look the same to me. Did you mean some different path? Yes, Attempt #2 Project outside workspace; Move of /Users/me/git/X to /Users/me/git/Z, as expected, moves the project to Z but does not rename it. > Robin, since you opened this bug against the UI I'm guessing you're meaning > that the wrong parameters are being passed and that this is not a bug in the > Resources layer? I'm not 100% sure where the bug is, so it's either the UI layer or the resource layer. I picked the one that is easiest to demonstrate. The resource API isn't very clear on how to achieve the various cases, which might be the reason that this bug has surviced thus far. That would point the finger at the resource API... *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 338383 *** |