Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 358444

Summary: Wrong display of Relationship Anchors
Product: [Technology] Tigerstripe Reporter: Marc FLAUW <marc.flauw>
Component: UIAssignee: Project Inbox <tigerstripe.ui-inbox>
Status: VERIFIED FIXED QA Contact:
Severity: normal    
Priority: P3 CC: chrhartl, nmehrega, valentin
Version: 0.6M1   
Target Milestone: 0.5M0   
Hardware: PC   
OS: Windows Vista   
Whiteboard:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Attaching snapshot to clarify what Marc is suggesting none

Description Marc FLAUW CLA 2011-09-21 11:26:53 EDT 
Hello,

I am running Tigerstripe 0.6.935.201102010903.

I think there is a bug in the way the relations are displayed in the explorer.  In fact, there are all displayed wrongly. 

I checked the “Show Relationship Anchors” in the Preferences/Tigerstripe/Explorer. 

I have an association artifact “AlarmHasTrackingRecords” between ResourceAlarm Entity and TrackingRecord Entity, the aEnd name is alarm of type ResourceAlarm, the zEnd anme is trackingRecord of type TrackingRecord . It is navigable from ResourceAlarm to TrackingRecord, so only the end TrackingRecord is checked as navigable. 

Tigerstripe is showing in the explorer: alarm:TrackingRecord (AlarmHasTrackingRecord), so giving it the name of the end on the ResourceAlarm side while I would expect to get trackingRecord:TrackingRecord (AlarmHasTrackingRecord).

RSM for instance is displaying the roles (a/z end) in the order corresponding to what would be expected. I used this example but this is valid for all associations. This is quite annoying and limits the use of the relationship anchors. 

Best regards,

Marc
Comment 1 Navid Mehregani CLA 2011-09-21 13:12:51 EDT 
Created attachment 203791 [details]
Attaching snapshot to clarify what Marc is suggesting

Attaching snapshot to clarify what Marc is suggesting.

I think what Marc is suggesting makes sense.  Need to communicate this with our modeling team to make sure they're on the same page.
Comment 2 Chris Hartley CLA 2011-09-21 13:49:48 EDT 
I agree with Marc

e.g. under

Resource Alarm, I'll see
trackingRecord:TrackingRecord

under TrackingRecord, I'll see
alarm:ResourceAlarm
Comment 3 Marc FLAUW CLA 2011-09-22 07:19:57 EDT 
Thanks for the snapshot, it illustrates perfectly my point. 
and thanks for supporting the case.
Comment 4 Valentin Yerastov CLA 2011-10-05 17:15:49 EDT 
fixed
Comment 5 Navid Mehregani CLA 2011-10-10 00:57:16 EDT 
Marking as fixed.
Comment 6 Navid Mehregani CLA 2011-10-10 00:57:31 EDT 
Verified. Thanks!