| Summary: | Augment defaults.pref to allow adding plug-ins on the same server in a seamless way | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [ECD] Orion | Reporter: | Szymon Brandys <Szymon.Brandys> |
| Component: | Client | Assignee: | Silenio Quarti <Silenio_Quarti> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P4 | CC: | eclipse, gorkem.ercan, mamacdon, pedemont, simon_kaegi, snorthov |
| Version: | 0.2 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows 7 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Szymon Brandys
Untargetting and tempted to say WONTFIX. A custom install might want to do this but I suspect it just complicates things. A marginally better approach might be a mechanism to pre-populate user settings as opposed to using defaults for that purpose. *** Bug 404715 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Bug 380809 is another duplicate (or data point). I think this is preventing the orion java server bits to be consumed directly. For instance I am force to use a filter because I do not want to fork orion to get my client plugins to be on by default. IMHO there should be a mechanism to aggregate default active client plugins from the server pieces, that may eliminate the need to maintain a .pref file completely and give to responsibility to server pieces. @Simon do you think this makes sense? I probably can come up with a patch for this [1] https://github.com/gorkem/orion-openshift/blob/master/bundles/org.jboss.orion.openshift.server.core/src/org/jboss/orion/openshift/server/core/OpenshiftDefaulsPrefs.java This open bug report had a target milestone in the past. The target milestone has been removed. Please target for a date in the future or leave the target blank if it is not known. (In reply to Gorkem Ercan from comment #4) > IMHO there should be a mechanism to aggregate default active client plugins > from the server pieces, that may eliminate the need to maintain a .pref file > completely and give to responsibility to server pieces. I'm not convinced this can be decentralized.. it is a "product level" decision. I think every component/plugin would say "my plugin should be included by default" but a product may not want it. Something like a server configuration setting specifying location of the plugin list could work. Closing as part of a mass clean up of inactive bugs. Please reopen if this problem still occurs or is relevant to you. For more details see: https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/orion-dev/msg04002.html Reopening as suggested. Closing as part of a mass clean up of inactive bugs. Please reopen if this problem still occurs or is relevant to you. For more details see: https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/orion-dev/msg04114.html |