Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
| Summary: | New RUI project needs to be a Java project | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | z_Archived | Reporter: | Justin Spadea <jspadea> | ||||
| Component: | EDT | Assignee: | Huang Ji Yong <hjiyong> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | normal | ||||||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | chenzhh, greer, smythew, tdramsey | ||||
| Version: | unspecified | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | PC | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Justin Spadea
I think if we need to run dedicated services in the project, maybe we should create a "Web Client with Service Project". If we add java nature to web client project, I don't think there is much differences between these two kind of projects. Maybe we should just remove "Web client project" template. Will, what do you think? I think we should keep both project templates (web client and web client with services) since the developer may only be interested in writing client-side logic (and should not have to deal with Java and JavaScript generators configured on the project and the added complexity this brings). So, I vote to just add the Java nature to projects created with the 'web client' template .. I think we should keep both project templates (web client and web client with services) since the developer may only be interested in writing client-side logic (and should not have to deal with Java and JavaScript generators configured on the project and the added complexity this brings). So, I vote to just add the Java nature to projects created with the 'web client' template .. I agree with Will. Created attachment 203982 [details]
Add java nature to Web Client Project
Make web client project to be a java project. Verified |