Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 357356

Summary:

[mediawiki] styles in image caption break image

Product:

z_Archived

Reporter:

Nicolas Bros <nicolas.bros>

Component:

Mylyn

Assignee:

Project Inbox <mylyn-triaged>

Status:

RESOLVED WONTFIX

QA Contact:

David Green <greensopinion>

Severity:

normal

Priority:

CC:

nicolas.bros

Version:

1.5

Keywords:

helpwanted

Target Milestone:

---

Hardware:

OS:

Windows 7

Whiteboard:

Attachments:

Description	Flags
mylyn/context/zip	none
screenshot of test image on en.wikipedia.org	none

Description Nicolas Bros

2011-09-12 05:36:04 EDT

For example, this is not recognized as an image because of the italic style:
[[Image:test.png|Example with ''italics'']]

Comment 1 David Green

2011-09-13 14:10:45 EDT

Thanks for the bug.  Relevant code is in the attached context.  

A fix for this bug should move to phrase modifiers for images.

Comment 2 David Green

2011-09-13 14:10:47 EDT

Created attachment 203275 [details]
mylyn/context/zip

Comment 3 David Green

2011-11-10 19:26:54 EST

Is it common to do this?  From what I can see MediaWiki ignores these styles anyways.  What is your use case?

Comment 4 Nicolas Bros

2011-11-11 04:44:23 EST

(In reply to comment #3)
> Is it common to do this?
No, I don't think it's very common, but it can still be useful. You can consider it as a low priority feature.

> From what I can see MediaWiki ignores these styles anyways.
Maybe that's because I forgot the "thumb" attribute in my previous comment:
  [[Image:test.png|thumb|Example with ''italics'' and '''bold''']]
I tested on "en.wikipedia.org" and it works there (see attached screenshot).

> What is your use case?
I just wanted to emphasize a word in an image caption.

Comment 5 Nicolas Bros

2011-11-11 04:45:05 EST

Created attachment 206832 [details]
screenshot of test image on en.wikipedia.org

Comment 6 David Green

2013-08-02 12:41:58 EDT

Closed as part of backlog clean-up.  Please re-open if you'd like to see this revisited, perhaps with a contribution.