| Summary: | Generic ODA driver (and tooling) developed in bug 330988, does not work with java.util.Date types | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Modeling] EMF | Reporter: | John Conlon <jconlon> | ||||
| Component: | Core | Assignee: | Kenn Hussey <Kenn.Hussey> | ||||
| Status: | VERIFIED FIXED | QA Contact: | Kenn Hussey <Kenn.Hussey> | ||||
| Severity: | normal | ||||||
| Priority: | P3 | Flags: | Kenn.Hussey:
indigo+
|
||||
| Version: | unspecified | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | SR1 | ||||||
| Hardware: | PC | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
John Conlon
Created attachment 202570 [details]
Checks for date types and converts java.util.Date to java.sql.Date
This patch seems to fix it for me.
The fix has been committed to CVS (head and maintenance). Builds will be made available early next week. Builds containing this fix are now available at http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/downloads/?project=emf and in the following update sites: HEAD (2.8.0) http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/emf/updates/2.8-I-builds/ Maintenance (2.7.1) http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/emf/updates/2.7.x/ (In reply to comment #3) > Builds containing this fix are now available at > http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/downloads/?project=emf Don't find the oda features in the M201109050916 (2011/09/05) 2.7.x Maintenance Build, where I would have expected it to be. > and in the following > update sites: > > HEAD (2.8.0) > http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/emf/updates/2.8-I-builds/ > > Maintenance (2.7.1) > http://download.eclipse.org/modeling/emf/emf/updates/2.7.x/ But do see it is in the 2.7.1 Maintenance update site. (In reply to comment #4) > Don't find the oda features in the M201109050916 (2011/09/05) 2.7.x Maintenance > Build, where I would have expected it to be. Sorry, you're right, the ODA SDK isn't currently included in the legacy downloads, other than as part of the "all-in-one update site" archive, from which you could install the features locally if you wanted. The expectation is that consumers should be transitioning to the (hosted) update site if they haven't already... |