| Summary: | [variables] Refreshing view followed by collapse-all action creates blank entry in view. | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Eclipse Project] Platform | Reporter: | Pawel Piech <pawel.1.piech> | ||||||
| Component: | Debug | Assignee: | Platform-Debug-Inbox <platform-debug-inbox> | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | |||||||
| Severity: | major | ||||||||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | Michael_Rennie, mober.at+eclipse | ||||||
| Version: | 3.7 | ||||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | PC | ||||||||
| OS: | Linux-GTK | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||
| Bug Depends on: | 356414 | ||||||||
| Bug Blocks: | |||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
Pawel Piech
Created attachment 202569 [details]
Screenshot of bug.
Created attachment 202848 [details] Workaround patch in case fixing the underlying bug 356414 is a problem. Pawel, how do you want to proceed on this ? (In reply to comment #2) > Created attachment 202848 [details] > Workaround patch in case fixing the underlying bug 356414 is a problem. My vote would be to not apply a workaround to debug. Reasons for my vote: 1. the encounter rate for this issue is very low 2. the workaround introduces a negative performance impact 3. we will inevitably forget about the workaround, and when SWT fixes the other bug we will have a performance hit with no side benefits. I would mark this issue as 'readme' and push on SWT to fix the underlying problem. (In reply to comment #4) > My vote would be to not apply a workaround to debug. I don't think there's any real performance impact in the workaround, but I'd also rather fix the real bug, especially since it's a low level one. Fixed by SWT *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 356414 *** |