Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 355836

Summary:	Two CLOSED/FIXED bugs marked iplog+ are not appear in the Jubula IP Log
Product:	Community	Reporter:	Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton>
Component:	IP Log Tool	Assignee:	Wayne Beaton <wayne.beaton>
Status:	CLOSED WORKSFORME	QA Contact:
Severity:	normal
Priority:	P3	CC:	Achim.Loerke
Version:	unspecified
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	PC
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:

Description Wayne Beaton

2011-08-25 09:53:35 EDT

Two CLOSED/FIXED bugs marked iplog+ are not appearing in the Jubula project's auto-generated IP Log.

Jubula 335565 Monitoring-Reports can unnecessarily overfill the database
* 187729: new version of previous patch [iplog+] (PATCH) 2011.01.27
Jubula 335671 Enhance the tooltip and decorator mechanism for external usage
* 187840: patch which contains the enhancement v2 (now with the missing package) [iplog+] (PATCH) 2011.01.28

It appears as though the project is doing everything right. The attachments--contributed by a non-committer--are correctly marked and the bug is CLOSED.

Could it be the CLOSED status (rather than RESOLVED) that's causing the IP Log generator to miss these bugs?

Comment 1 Achim Loerke

2011-08-25 10:14:23 EDT

Would it be helpful to change the status of one of this bugs to resolved? Just as a test because we like our bugs closed :-)

Comment 2 Wayne Beaton

2011-08-25 11:07:47 EDT

It looks like both of these attachments have been explicitly excluded using the IP Log tool?

Any idea why? They look like contributions that should be tracked to me (and it'd be just as easy to simply remove the iplog+ flag if they're not).

Comment 3 Achim Loerke

2011-08-25 11:13:27 EDT

(In reply to comment #2)
> It looks like both of these attachments have been explicitly excluded using the
> IP Log tool?
> 
> Any idea why? 

Yes, my bad. I thought this were contributions to the 3.7 release without checking the titles. I have included them back into the log,

Sorry for the extra work.

Comment 4 Wayne Beaton

2014-04-04 15:06:33 EDT

I think WORKSFORME is the most appropriate way to close this.