Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
| Summary: | Feedback to first contribution: lucene.core | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Tools] Orbit | Reporter: | Robert Wetzold <robert.wetzold> | ||||
| Component: | bundles | Assignee: | Robert Wetzold <robert.wetzold> | ||||
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | enhancement | ||||||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | david_williams | ||||
| Version: | unspecified | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | PC | ||||||
| OS: | Windows 7 | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
I took a quick look, and basically looks ok, though is hard to tell from a quick peek at zip file. The "hard part" is getting it into the right branch, etc., in CVS ... so I recommend you go ahead and try that ... get it into cvs. Then, if you haven't yet, use Eclipse to "compare" with the 291 version to see if everything looks similar ... that is, manifest.mf and similar. (And, you know you can even check out both version into workspace, right? Use the "check out as ..." action, which give you a chance to get your workspace project its own unique name, such as org.apache.lucene.core v291 or similar.) HTH I see this in a build now, so assume we can mark as fixed? Feel free to reopen if I've misunderstood. Also, its nice to set the target milestone for when it first appeared ... not sure if Juno M5, or Juno M2? ... |
Created attachment 201308 [details] lucene.core 3.0.3 Hi, as discussed on the mailing list I will make several contributions to Orbit. It would be great if, before we actually submit, someone else could double check that we have got the structure right. The new v3_0_3 branch is already created. If this bundle is ok we will proceed accordingly with all the others and link them to the main feature. Regards, Robert