| Summary: | Gerrit 2.1.8-SNAPSHOT-GerritForge-B194: Failed to obtain Gerrit configuration | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | z_Archived | Reporter: | Sascha Scholz <sascha.scholz> | ||||
| Component: | Mylyn | Assignee: | Sascha Scholz <sascha.scholz> | ||||
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |||||
| Severity: | major | ||||||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | bbossola, selsemore, steffen.pingel | ||||
| Version: | unspecified | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | 0.9 | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | All | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Sascha Scholz
Created attachment 200900 [details]
Error log
Cannot reproduce with Gerrit 2.1.8 As far as I can see you are trying to connect to a standard Gerrit instance. Standard Gerrit does not include TeamForge(tm) connectivity and for that reason the call is failing. Please make sure that the gerrit endpoint you're connecting to is a valid GerritForge(tm) instance Ups, forgot to check the error log Fixed with 1504044f51a33103c11d2719e4bb4c54e1801956. Gerrit connector ignores unknown authentication types now. And btw, is there a public GerritForge instance available somewhere? Where can I find the sources? Is there any reason why when the AuthType is "TEAMFORGE", which we know will produce the error, the error could not be ignored entirely, and not logged as a warning (maybe as an option)? Because the warning is logged, the Error Log comes to the front every time a Gerrit repository configuration is updated or a Gerrit query is synchronized, which is a bis disruptive. I'm not sure. Please file a separate bug and attach a current error stack trace so we can consider reducing logging for an upcoming release. I'm also not sure whether it's a good idea to ignore it completely. The better option would be to support the authentication method. We would welcome a contribution. Are you aware of other differences in the JSON RPC communication layer between vanilla Gerrit and GerritForge? (In reply to comment #8) > I'm not sure. Please file a separate bug and attach a current error stack trace > so we can consider reducing logging for an upcoming release. Filed Bug 379489. |