| Summary: | EGLDoc syntax | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | z_Archived | Reporter: | Matt Heitz <mheitz> |
| Component: | EDT | Assignee: | Project Inbox <edt.tools-inbox> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | chenzhh, margolis, smythew, svihovec, tww |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows XP | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Matt Heitz
Perhaps we shouldn't use the @ character on our egldoc tags, since people may use it when writing about annotations and that might confuse our egldoc parser. For consistency with Java, I think we should use the @ within EGLDoc comments to indicate special bits of info like author, param, version, etc. created another bug to track the IDE support Bug 367640 - EGLDoc IDE support |