| Summary: | Eclipse Virgo Tooling does not show bundles in repository/usr | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [RT] Virgo | Reporter: | rshelley <ryan.shelley> |
| Component: | tooling | Assignee: | Project Inbox <virgo-inbox> |
| Status: | CLOSED INVALID | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | eclipse, frieder.heugel, milesparker, mlippert, pasch |
| Version: | 3.0.0.M06 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Macintosh | ||
| OS: | Mac OS X - Carbon (unsup.) | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 368783 | ||
|
Description
rshelley
This will need to be looked in to but I can answer one question for now. The tooling only shows what is in the configured repositories. An artifact that has been deployed to Virgo may not have come from one of the repositories so won't show up in the tooling but as it's deployed and started it will show up on the Artifacts tab of the admin console. (In reply to comment #1) > This will need to be looked in to but I can answer one question for now. The > tooling only shows what is in the configured repositories. An artifact that has > been deployed to Virgo may not have come from one of the repositories so won't > show up in the tooling but as it's deployed and started it will show up on the > Artifacts tab of the admin console. We could look into supporting that as appropriate. I'm not sure that it *would* be appropriate to use the ones defined by pickup though. That seems to me like it should be a one-way trip, i.e. I can't think of a scneario where projects really should be depending on what is simply in the pickup dir. I think the more general case could be supported by configuring those repositories on the Runtime side if we handle bug 333958? Was this supposed to have been closed as invalid, or did I just do that accidently? If the latter, please reopen. I tested it and using - Eclipse Virgo Tools 1.0.0.201207051634-SNAPSHOT (not the current Milestone M5) - Virgo Tomcat Server 3.5.0.RELEASE solved the problem. Great, thanks for following up Helmut. |