Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 352902

Summary:	Generate source tarball for EMF as used by e4
Product:	[Tools] Linux Tools	Reporter:	Andrew Overholt <overholt>
Component:	eclipse-build	Assignee:	Krzysztof Daniel <krzysztof.daniel>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED	QA Contact:
Severity:	normal
Priority:	P3	CC:	krzysztof.daniel, swagiaal
Version:	unspecified
Target Milestone:	1.0
Hardware:	PC
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Bug Depends on:	351712, 352903
Bug Blocks:	350248

Description Andrew Overholt

2011-07-22 15:10:18 EDT

Other than bug 351712, I also filed bug 352901 because I can't figure out how to associate the source code revision with what went into the p2 repository.

Comment 1 Andrew Overholt

2011-07-26 11:03:16 EDT

I've put a temporary tarball up here:

http://fedorapeople.org/~overholt/emfFore4-2.7.0-src.tar.bz2

Comment 2 Andrew Overholt

2012-01-04 11:44:12 EST

We may just be able to use git snapshots (maybe even the tarballs generated from git.eclipse.org on tag pages).

Comment 3 Krzysztof Daniel

2012-02-28 12:36:34 EST

I put the necessary emf bundles into e4 tarball - emf got actually promoted to platform code in 4.2.
http://download.eclipse.org/technology/linuxtools/eclipse-build/4.2.x/

Comment 4 Andrew Overholt

2012-02-28 14:11:13 EST

(In reply to comment #3)
> emf got actually promoted to platform code in 4.2.

Do you mean that it's at the same +0 level?

Comment 5 Krzysztof Daniel

2012-02-29 03:45:24 EST

Good question.

I had in mind the stack change, which is in 3.x:

osgi + jface
sdk
emf

and in 4.x:
osgi + jface
emf
sdk

But the fact that EMF is still +1, while the depending e4 sdk is +0 looks weird.

Comment 6 Paul Webster

2012-02-29 07:40:48 EST

(In reply to comment #5)
> 
> But the fact that EMF is still +1, while the depending e4 sdk is +0 looks
> weird.

EMF does their build in 2 parts now.  Base is +0 (has the most stable runtime core of EMF, like emf.common, emf.ecore, etc).  The rest of the core is still +1

PW

Comment 7 Andrew Overholt

2012-02-29 09:53:40 EST

Thanks for the info :)