| Summary: | extensibility design flaw == Tim needs to look into | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | z_Archived | Reporter: | Jeff Douglas <jeffdouglas> |
| Component: | EDT | Assignee: | Project Inbox <edt.genframework-inbox> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | greer, hjiyong, tww |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows XP | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Jeff Douglas
As per discussion with Tim. This should not be a problem, because of the original work in javagen or javascriptgen. This original work separated each of the classes from one another making each of the templates independent. When a user generator comes along to extend the original, they are merely extending this independent class. They are not creating any kind of structure. This means that this extended independent class can still be extended by yet another generator. There shouldn't be any problem showing up. Closing this work item |