| Summary: | Link to Name Style preference page from Generate Getters and Setters page | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Tools] CDT | Reporter: | Marc-André Laperle <malaperle> | ||||||||
| Component: | cdt-refactoring | Assignee: | Marc-André Laperle <malaperle> | ||||||||
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Emanuel Graf <emanuel> | ||||||||
| Severity: | enhancement | ||||||||||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | cdtdoug, eclipse.sprigogin | ||||||||
| Version: | 8.0 | Flags: | eclipse.sprigogin:
review+
|
||||||||
| Target Milestone: | 8.0.1 | ||||||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||||||
| OS: | All | ||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||
|
Description
Marc-André Laperle
Created attachment 199789 [details]
Link to Name Style preference page patch
The patch adds a link to Name Style and refreshes the function declarations when preferences change. (In reply to comment #2) The patch looks good except for a minor wording issue. The message "The generated code of the getters/setters may be configured on the Name Style preference page." is somewhat misleading since the generated code may depend on other preferences too. It would be more accurate to say: "The names of getters and setters may be configured on the Name Style preference page." I would also put a spacer above the message to separate it visually from the "Place implementation in header file" check box. (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > I would also put a spacer above the message to separate it visually from the > "Place implementation in header file" check box. A spacer? An horizontal separator or just some empty space? (In reply to comment #4) > A spacer? An horizontal separator or just some empty space? Just some empty space. Created attachment 199805 [details] Link to Name Style preference page patch, revised (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > The patch looks good except for a minor wording issue. The message "The > generated code of the getters/setters may be configured on the Name Style > preference page." is somewhat misleading since the generated code may depend on > other preferences too. It would be more accurate to say: "The names of getters > and setters may be configured on the Name Style preference page." You're right, that's better. > I would also put a spacer above the message to separate it visually from the > "Place implementation in header file" check box. Space added. Comment on attachment 199805 [details]
Link to Name Style preference page patch, revised
Woops, patch includes other changes.
Created attachment 199806 [details]
Link to Name Style preference page patch, revised
Fixed in 8.0 and master. *** cdt git genie on behalf of 352262 ***
Bug 352262 - Link to Name Style preference page from Generate Getters
and Setters page
[*] http://git.eclipse.org/c/cdt/org.eclipse.cdt.git/commit/?id=11963d3ec565744758c2fa4ac4b8e947ee71733d
*** cdt git genie on behalf of 352262 ***
Bug 352262 - Link to Name Style preference page from Generate Getters
and Setters page
[*] http://git.eclipse.org/c/cdt/org.eclipse.cdt.git/commit/?id=7184f89ff4591bc3da4dd80f34c2be83bc556aea
|