Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 348880

Summary:

[ActivityDiagram]Can not resize a group to exclude contained nodes

Product:

[Modeling] Papyrus

Reporter:

Vincent Hémery <vincent.hemery>

Component:

Core

Assignee:

Mathieu Velten <mathieu.velten>

Status:

CLOSED FIXED

QA Contact:

Severity:

major

Priority:

CC:

nifauvergue, toni.siljamaki

Version:

0.8.0

Target Milestone:

SR1

Hardware:

OS:

Windows XP

Whiteboard:

Attachments:

Description	Flags
Patch to correct the bug	vincent.hemery: iplog+

Description Vincent Hémery

2011-06-09 08:18:37 EDT

From 0.8.0 RC2, it is not possible to resize an ActivityGroup ( Partition, StructuredActivityNode ...) so that contained nodes are excluded from it.

To reproduce :
- create an Activity Partition
- put nodes in it (near a corner)
- try resizing the group so that the node is no longer contained.

Resize is blocked whereas it should be enabled and the node should be excluded.

Comment 1 Arthur Daussy

2011-06-15 05:10:01 EDT

Created attachment 198003 [details]
Patch to correct the bug

I, Arthur Daussy, have worked on the code contributed to fix this bug.
I have the right to contribute this code and have filled the headers with the appropriate License.

The patch (see attachment) should correct the bug. It has not yet been committed to the trunk dued to the Eclipse Freeze.

Comment 2 Arthur Daussy

2011-06-20 11:24:10 EDT

Committed on the  trunk

Comment 3 Mathieu Velten

2011-06-20 11:25:50 EDT

fixed.

Comment 4 Mathieu Velten

2011-06-20 11:26:28 EDT

committed on the 0.8.X branch, will be backported on trunk after the freeze.

Comment 5 Mathieu Velten

2011-06-27 05:50:45 EDT

reopened for arthur.

Comment 6 Arthur Daussy

2011-06-27 07:02:19 EDT

backported on the trunk

Comment 7 Arthur Daussy

2011-06-27 07:03:46 EDT

Not handle well resizing excluding element from all structured activity node derived group.

Comment 8 Toni Siljamäki

2013-10-10 08:22:58 EDT

Has this one been fixed or has it not? = is the bug still valid?

Comment 9 Nicolas FAUVERGUE

2018-06-11 10:58:07 EDT

This is no longer valid on Photon RC2.