| Summary: | What are project "status summaries"? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Community | Reporter: | David Williams <david_williams> |
| Component: | Project Management & Portal | Assignee: | Portal Bugzilla Dummy Inbox <portal-inbox> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
David Williams
BTW, I noticed this, or was "lead to it" while reviewing some up-coming changes to dev. process ... reading http://eclipse.org/projects/dev_process/development_process_2011.php?commentary And there say "All projects are required to report their status at least quarterly using the EMO defined status reporting procedures." It didn't looked marked as "new", but I didn't recall seeing/hearing about it before, so followed the link in that sentence to the "how to" ... and, there, found it sort of vague. So, my main questions I guess could be said to be, is this a new requirement? Is there something specific type of status to report quarterly? Or does the dev. process statement just mean, basically, keep metadata up to date? Pragamatically speaking, it's the latter: keep your project metadata up to date. That entry has been there for as long as I can remember. The discussion of status summaries looks like a holdover from when project metadata was stored in files. I've updated the entries. |