| Summary: | ProblemBindingChecker should be conditioned on resolution of includes | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Tools] CDT | Reporter: | Sergey Prigogin <eclipse.sprigogin> |
| Component: | cdt-codan | Assignee: | CDT Codan Inbox <cdt-codan-inbox> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Elena Laskavaia <elaskavaia.cdt> |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | cdtdoug, yevshif, zeratul976 |
| Version: | 8.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
|
Description
Sergey Prigogin
I think this would be too big of a hammer. You can often have situations where only a handful of includes are unresolved in a file (and it's difficult to get them to be resolved - let's say they concern a different platform than the one you are running on) and they cause a few false positive problem bindings, but having other problem bindings reported in the code can still be useful. (In reply to comment #1) The hammer could be made optional. Such behavior of the checker would match the standard behavior of the compiler. |