Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
| Summary: | [1.5][compiler] Suspect name clash problem from eclipse. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Eclipse Project] JDT | Reporter: | Srikanth Sankaran <srikanth_sankaran> |
| Component: | Core | Assignee: | Srikanth Sankaran <srikanth_sankaran> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | normal | ||
| Priority: | P3 | CC: | Olivier_Thomann |
| Version: | 3.7 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Windows XP | ||
| Whiteboard: | stalebug | ||
This is a follow up from bug 334306. The fix should also include a regression test for the interface case. (In reply to comment #1) > This is a follow up from bug 334306. The fix should also include > a regression test for the interface case. We have a regression test for the interface scenario in org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.compiler.regression.MethodVerifyTest.test144() (In reply to comment #2) > We have a regression test for the interface scenario in > org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.compiler.regression.MethodVerifyTest.test144() Also org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.compiler.regression.AmbiguousMethodTest.test076() and org.eclipse.jdt.core.tests.compiler.regression.AmbiguousMethodTest.test079() Adding the following lines: // https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=345947 if (!current.areTypeVariableErasuresEqual(original)) { return false; } just before reporting methodNameClash in org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.lookup.MethodVerifier15.detectNameClash(MethodBinding, MethodBinding, boolean) fixes the issue. This results in a total of 75 test failures in: AmbiguousMethodTest, MethodVerifyTest, GenericTypeTest. Some of the "failing" cases simply call for remastering the expected output, as the new behavior matches with javac, a few others still needs more analysis. The fact that Sun compiler has its own idiosyncrasies (and bugs) makes this exercise a bit more involved. Don't expect to have time now. Will take this up later. This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet. If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant. -- The automated Eclipse Genie. |
The following program generates a name clash error with eclipse while javac 5,6,7 compile it alright. At first glance, eclipse behavior appears suspect: abstract class I { abstract I b(); } abstract class J extends I { abstract <U> J b(); }