Some Eclipse Foundation services are deprecated, or will be soon. Please ensure you've read this important communication.

Bug 345366

Summary:	comparator error: LaunchViewCopyToClipboardActionDelegate.java: sizes differ by 33 bytes
Product:	[Eclipse Project] Platform	Reporter:	Dani Megert <daniel_megert>
Component:	Debug	Assignee:	Pawel Piech <pawel.1.piech>
Status:	VERIFIED FIXED	QA Contact:
Severity:	normal
Priority:	P3	CC:	daniel_megert, kim.moir, Michael_Rennie, Olivier_Thomann, pawel.1.piech
Version:	3.7	Flags:	Michael_Rennie: review+
Target Milestone:	3.7 RC1
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:

Description Dani Megert

2011-05-11 03:16:24 EDT

I20110510-0800.

LaunchViewCopyToClipboardActionDelegate.java: sizes differ by 33 bytes

'org.eclipse.debug.ui' probably needs to be released with a new tag.

Before doing that I'd like clarify some points:
1. Kim: did you update the builder?
2. if so, Olivier: do we have a change in the compiler that justifies the byte
   code difference?

Comment 1 Pawel Piech

2011-05-11 11:15:00 EDT

It's my fault.  I tried releasing this module but I ended up only moving the existing tag.

Comment 2 Dani Megert

2011-05-11 11:34:50 EDT

(In reply to comment #1)
> It's my fault.  I tried releasing this module but I ended up only moving the
> existing tag.

Thanks for letting us know. Note that moving tags is discouraged unless one knows for sure what one is doing ;-). The Releng tool should always be used to to the build input.

Can you make a build input (Team > Release), so that the bytes get back in order?

Comment 3 Olivier Thomann

2011-05-11 11:40:17 EDT

(In reply to comment #1)
> It's my fault.  I tried releasing this module but I ended up only moving the
> existing tag.
A tag cannot be reused if a build occurred and consumed that tag.

Comment 4 Pawel Piech

2011-05-11 15:08:56 EDT

I retagged and released using v20110511.  Sorry about the mess.  Mike please review my tagging.

Comment 5 Michael Rennie

2011-05-11 15:32:53 EDT

The jdtdebug map file looks good

Comment 6 Dani Megert

2011-05-16 03:35:07 EDT

The comparator test no longer failed in I20110514-0800.